We performed a comparison between OpenVPN Access Server and SecureLink based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about OpenVPN, Fortinet, Cisco and others in Enterprise Infrastructure VPN."It's an ideal gateway solution for small and medium businesses, i.e., around 300 devices can be easily handled."
"The solution has good performance."
"It was very easy to set up users."
"Provides privacy and cryptography for my network communication."
"The product provides secure internet connections and helps with faster downloads."
"It can securely do remote product updates... just as if it was on our LAN."
"OpenVPN Access Server is cheap, and we get to use it ourselves. It is also a stable solution."
"The most valuable thing about OpenVPN Access Server is its ease of use."
"The compatibility with almost any Linux operating system, and how easy it is to write scripts and generate keys for people to use and log in. I found it easy to deploy quickly."
"The stability is very reliable in my experience."
"The most valuable feature is synchronizing the limited access for partners or sub-contractors."
"There must be a more easy-to-use GUI."
"One improvement I would like to see in OpenVPN is better adaptability in certain geographical areas."
"It is not scalable."
"I would like to see a GUI or Web UI to manage users. Today these features are in the Pro Edition or are done by scripts."
"There was one annoying feature where we had to disable and enable the user. I cannot remember what it was exactly, but I think it was for a password lockout. It would be nice if there was a checkbox, or something, in the web interface to allow you to unlock a user whose password was locked."
"The high availability deployment is not very straightforward. They can make it simpler. OpenVPN does not support some of the additional protocols that Pulse Secure and Cisco AnyConnect support. They can include support for these additional protocols."
"There sometimes is an incompatibility between some VPNs."
"I think right now the GUI part of it is locked out behind the pay wall. It could use something that gives it a very basic, minimal, graphic interface for logging in, for the community version. That would probably be a good step forward."
"The stability had room for improvement."
"The security features offered in SecureLink are not enough."
Earn 20 points
OpenVPN Access Server is ranked 1st in Enterprise Infrastructure VPN with 45 reviews while SecureLink is ranked 39th in Enterprise Infrastructure VPN. OpenVPN Access Server is rated 8.4, while SecureLink is rated 7.0. The top reviewer of OpenVPN Access Server writes "An easy-to-use tool with which its users can access networks from home or external locations". On the other hand, the top reviewer of SecureLink writes "Efficient technical support with good synchronization features, but it needs better security". OpenVPN Access Server is most compared with Fortinet FortiClient, Cisco AnyConnect Secure Mobility Client, Microsoft Azure VPN Gateway, Check Point Remote Access VPN and SonicWall Netextender, whereas SecureLink is most compared with Citrix Gateway and Microsoft Azure VPN Gateway.
See our list of best Enterprise Infrastructure VPN vendors.
We monitor all Enterprise Infrastructure VPN reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.