We performed a comparison between Oracle Coherence and Redis based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two In-Memory Data Store Services solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."Technical support from Oracle is okay."
"The most valuable features of Redis are its ease of use and speed. It does not have access to the disc and it is fast."
"The online interface is very fast and easy to use."
"Redis is a simple, powerful, and fast solution."
"I use Redis mostly to cache repeated data that is required."
"It makes operations more efficient. The information processing is very fast, and very responsive. It's all about the technology."
"The in-memory data makes it fast."
"The ability to fetch and save data quickly is valuable."
"Redis is better tested and is used by large companies. I haven't found a direct alternative to what Redis offers. Plus, there are a lot of support and learning resources available, which help you use Redis efficiently."
"This platform has issues with stability and performance."
"It's actually quite expensive."
"If we use a lot of data, it will eventually cost us a lot."
"The tool should improve by increasing its size limits and handling dynamic data better. We use the client ID or associate it with a key for static content. The solution will not be easy for a beginner. Unless you understand SQL data, it will be difficult to understand and use Redis. It also needs to be user-friendly."
"In future releases, I would like Redis to provide its users with an option like schema validation. Currently, the solution lacks to offer such functionality."
"I would prefer it if there was more information available about Redis. That would make it easier for new beginners. Currently, there is a lack of resources."
"There is a lack of documentation on the scalability of the solution."
"Sometimes, we use Redis as a cluster, and the clusters can sometimes suffer some issues and bring some downtime to your application."
"The only thing is the lack of a GUI application. There was a time when we needed to resolve an issue in production. If we had a GUI, it would have been easier."
Earn 20 points
Oracle Coherence is ranked 10th in In-Memory Data Store Services while Redis is ranked 1st in In-Memory Data Store Services with 11 reviews. Oracle Coherence is rated 7.8, while Redis is rated 8.4. The top reviewer of Oracle Coherence writes "Pro-active caching improved risk calculation time and allowed the risk grid to scale with volume growth". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Redis writes "Enables efficient caching and helps users fetch and save data quickly". Oracle Coherence is most compared with GridGain, IDERA ER/Studio and Terracotta, whereas Redis is most compared with Amazon SQS, Google Cloud Memorystore, Chroma and ActiveMQ. See our Oracle Coherence vs. Redis report.
See our list of best In-Memory Data Store Services vendors.
We monitor all In-Memory Data Store Services reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.