We performed a comparison between OutSystems and Temenos Quantum based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Mobile Development Platforms solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."For me, the most valuable feature is the flexibility the tools give us to change any customer requirements on the fly, when we are in a meeting. I also like how easy it is to deploy the code between environments and how easy it is to integrate OutSystems with other systems."
"It is easy to use."
"The architecture of OutSystems is quite simple, and the features are similar to Mendix's. OutSystems has connectors for different enterprise apps and solid reporting capabilities. You can also integrate with any content management platform like SharePoint or Adobe Enterprise Manager, or something like that. You can also create and integrate workflows."
"It is a stable solution."
"I like the mobile features the most, and there are also various features around the portal we created that I enjoy."
"The most valuable feature is Agile development. I love that you save a lot of time on development and can focus on logic and business requirements."
"Refactoring with TrueChange is very simple."
"We used almost all of the features, themes, styling guide, and approach components. They are useful in our applications."
"Comparing other solutions with Temenos Quantum, the later is less mature and presents several issues. Implementing Temenos Quantum has been challenging, resembling a nightmare compared to the smoother experience with the other."
"You can do rapid development across multiple platforms."
"The most valuable feature is usability. You can develop components inside it and reuse them in different parts of your application, wherever needed. You can replicate them. There's also a Quantum Fabric on the back end, which provides a middle layer between your database and the third-party systems you need to integrate. It also provides the integration to handle all sorts of exceptions and timeouts on the Fabric. This makes it easy to troubleshoot errors coming from third-party APIs."
"Its greatest advantage lies in its exceptional security and robustness."
"It is a single platform that can cater to mobile and web development requirements, making it convenient for businesses looking to transition into the digital space."
"The best feature is the Kony Studio, which is the product that is used to develop interfaces."
"I like the complete, professional social site."
"The initial setup of Temenos Quantum was easy."
"I would like to see improvements in versioning. It can be challenging to keep track of what changes should be committed, especially when many developers are working in one environment."
"I would like to see OutSystems improve its integration capabilities, especially with emerging technologies like AI and GPT."
"I think OutSystems needs to improve in many areas. First, sometimes Service Studio becomes really slow and even hangs for long periods. Also, if I have not published my module in some time, and some kind of Service Studio exception occurs, I lose my work."
"The technical features are good, but the actual commercialization is out of reach."
"I like the OutSystems platform. I am working on integrating it with another platform using APIs, however, it has proven to be difficult. The main issue I am facing is obtaining authorization tokens as well as access and refresh tokens. It may be due to my lack of knowledge of APIs as it is new to me."
"I have difficulty in using several new features. Some of the product's features are tricky to use as well."
"The dashboards in OutSystems could improve. There are a lot of tabs in the service center that can be confusing."
"The initial setup is a little difficult."
"One area where Temenos Quantum could improve is in the flexibility of widgets and additional libraries."
"They need to improve their tech support's abilities. They do have a good tech support, but it still requires improvement."
"Using the API manager can be complicated when you're dealing with multiple teams, projects, and APIs. Quantum doesn't have user-based access, so I can't restrict parts of the project to specific users."
"The technology of the solution needs an update. It is deficient in terms of connectivity."
"There is definitely room for improvement, especially in the areas of AI, AR, and DR for mobile and web applications"
"Some features are only enabled for paid users. It would be much better if they enabled those features without having to pay. I would also like to see them publish information about future technologies on the Home screen under a separate tab. That would be an improvement."
"Temenos Quantum needs to improve its usability. It lacks information on the network. We have to contact the support when we are stuck with something."
"The UI lacks flexibility, especially regarding customizations. There are numerous issues at the fabric end, and working with the visualizer is extremely challenging. Basic development tasks require a high-end machine, and even clicking on an icon initiates a thirty-second processing time. The challenges mainly revolve around fabric and content."
OutSystems is ranked 1st in Mobile Development Platforms with 46 reviews while Temenos Quantum is ranked 9th in Mobile Development Platforms with 15 reviews. OutSystems is rated 8.4, while Temenos Quantum is rated 7.2. The top reviewer of OutSystems writes "Useful natural speech to algorithm, reliable, and beneficial automatic task". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Temenos Quantum writes "Though a secure tool for building applications, there is a need to improve its stability". OutSystems is most compared with Microsoft Power Apps, Appian, Mendix, ServiceNow and Oracle Application Express (APEX), whereas Temenos Quantum is most compared with Microsoft Azure App Service and ServiceNow. See our OutSystems vs. Temenos Quantum report.
See our list of best Mobile Development Platforms vendors, best Rapid Application Development Software vendors, and best Low-Code Development Platforms vendors.
We monitor all Mobile Development Platforms reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.