We performed a comparison between Power Admin PA File Sight and Splunk Enterprise Security based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about Splunk, Wazuh, Datadog and others in Log Management."The customers who have the use case of monitoring the file server and want to know the user's activity. It's the Power Admin's requirement."
"Splunk has facilitated the correlation of information security logs to look for incidents which could cause damage to the company's infrastructure, as well as financial losses from leaks."
"It's extremely scalable. It's a very robust solution and certainly has the capability of handling far bigger data requirements than a lot of the other tools. Generally what ends up happening with me is that my clients tend, for the most part, to be mid-tier organizations where the cost of that solutions would be accompanying requirements for people just becomes way too prohibitive. Especially considering the model that they use for costing, which is based on the volume of data. Of course, they're going to put everything including the Coke machine as the ability to collect data off of it, because of course the more they can put through the tool the more money they make."
"It has reduced the time to resolution, time to investigate, and time to troubleshoot for debugging issues."
"It has virtual visualization, and other products do not."
"The most valuable feature is the custom dashboard feature."
"My favorite example of improving of organization is saving a $60k/mo in payroll fraud and $10k/mo in wasted API credits by using simple searches and clear reports."
"The level of robustness on offer is very good."
"Positive features include replication capabilities, software development kits, and the architecture."
"The setup takes half an hour. It will be a little complex."
"The configuration had a bit of a learning curve."
"The documentation is in definite need of improvement."
"It needs to improve the way to install third-party apps and enable installation without logging into splunk.com."
"We do have to educate developers on how to not blow it up. It is a little to easy to write an expensive query and overly stress the system. This could be improved."
"It currently has limited default rules and customizations. If they can concentrate more on the compliance part and the security information part, it would be helpful. The platform part is good, but it requires many features from the security aspect."
"The use cases provided by Splunk are a good starting point, but could cover many additional topics to ensure that a smaller or less experienced shop might maximize the value of an ES deployment."
"When we do a rollout from the server or host or anything, we'd like to see more automation. It would save us time."
"The only improvement I am expecting is the cost of the licensing. Clients are going to other solutions just because of the cost."
Power Admin PA File Sight is ranked 39th in Log Management with 1 review while Splunk Enterprise Security is ranked 1st in Log Management with 240 reviews. Power Admin PA File Sight is rated 9.0, while Splunk Enterprise Security is rated 8.4. The top reviewer of Power Admin PA File Sight writes "Good stability and preferred choice for DLP needs over other solutions". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Splunk Enterprise Security writes "It has a drag-and-drop interface, so you don't need to know SQL or Java to construct a query ". Power Admin PA File Sight is most compared with , whereas Splunk Enterprise Security is most compared with Wazuh, Dynatrace, IBM Security QRadar, Elastic Security and Microsoft Sentinel.
See our list of best Log Management vendors.
We monitor all Log Management reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.