We performed a comparison between Radware Alteon and Radware LinkProof based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Application Delivery Controllers (ADC) solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."The most valuable aspect is the ability to customize the types of load-balancing scenarios needed for customized applications. Some of the load balancers on the market today are strictly out-of-hand load balancers for SSL or HTTP. Radware Alteon is most useful for customizing in-house applications based on ports and protocols."
"The features that mitigate attacks are very valuable."
"Radware has been characterized by being extremely robust. This gives us the confidence to offer our users a continuous service."
"The device blocks threats and allows legitimate users to work correctly."
"It saves us a lot of work in terms of management since it has tasks already defined automatically. That enables us to better administer our services. It is very dynamic and easy to administer."
"The GUI was a valuable feature. It was uncomplicated and easy to use."
"The most valuable aspect is that it establishes user security."
"The command line interface is simple and very user-friendly."
"It is a stable solution...It is a scalable solution."
"The most valuable feature of Radware LinkProof is that it supports link load balance."
"The most valuable feature of Radware LinkProof for traffic distribution is its DNS management capability."
"Provides good performance and scalability."
"The performance and stability are the most valuable features."
"Support is very important because if we get good support, we'll be able to sell and supply more numbers."
"I would like to see the loading documentation improved."
"A feature that I would like to see included in the next version might be a better analysis when working with crypt issues. Right now, it is very manual; you load it into Alteon and it runs. It would be interesting to see a more dynamic process."
"The interface implementation can be improved."
"We recently had a problem with the tables Obsolete ARP which was observed by the support team. It would be good to diagnose and solve this problem with a patch since it is not documented that it will be solved in later updates."
"Load balancing needs improvement. It needs better integration. I heard f5 works as a DNS operator which is not available in this solution. It would be better if that was implemented."
"Support is an area that needs improvement."
"We are having a difficult time with the security module, and how to implement the Radware security."
"The solution lacks HA configuration."
"Could have more customizations on the dashboard."
"Radware LinkProof’s customer support could be improved."
"There are certain features I would like to see in the next release."
"Radware LinkProof's marketing efforts need improvement to raise awareness about its capabilities and compete effectively in the market."
Radware Alteon is ranked 7th in Application Delivery Controllers (ADC) with 33 reviews while Radware LinkProof is ranked 13th in Application Delivery Controllers (ADC) with 5 reviews. Radware Alteon is rated 8.4, while Radware LinkProof is rated 8.8. The top reviewer of Radware Alteon writes "It's a good fit for a small team because the maintenance is easier and you don't need to know how to code". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Radware LinkProof writes "Supports link load balance and has good stability". Radware Alteon is most compared with F5 BIG-IP Local Traffic Manager (LTM), Citrix NetScaler, HAProxy, A10 Networks Thunder ADC and Avi Networks Software Load Balancer, whereas Radware LinkProof is most compared with A10 Networks Thunder ADC and Fortinet FortiADC. See our Radware Alteon vs. Radware LinkProof report.
See our list of best Application Delivery Controllers (ADC) vendors.
We monitor all Application Delivery Controllers (ADC) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.