We performed a comparison between SAP Adaptive Server Enterprise and SAP HANA based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Relational Databases Tools solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."This is a wonderful database that is, in my opinion, underrated. Users are able to get the most out of my experience by taking advantage of its centralized environment."
"It's user-friendly, especially in the logistics field."
"The most valuable part of the tool stems from the fact that it is a very cost-efficient product compared to the newer technologies because it needs a very small amount of RAM."
"They provide easy integration with other systems."
"SAP Adaptive Server Enterprise is a good transactional database."
"I like that SAP ASE can match code and the database index to index data in the programming language. There are many other valuable features, such as the table buffer, tuning, and various control agents like dispatcher. SAP ASE can handle many different data types, including views, domains, data elements, structures, objects, and various table types that are most useful in the application. Its modularization technique is also handy."
"The actual interface is good."
"It's pretty good at handling a large number of transactions, which is critical for a banking client."
"The solution is easy to manage enterprise resources and the reporting and analytics are including. It is good for company growth and all module are managed well."
"The most valuable feature of SAP HANA is its performance and integration."
"Some functions have good performance."
"The main feature is that the processes are very flexible, they are able to be adapted to the business and their departments."
"One feature I find very valuable, is the response time of the application on the database memory."
"It's very convenient and very innovative."
"The most valuable feature of SAP HANA is the modeling of the databases."
"Technically it resembles Oracle, but as a somewhat lighter version."
"The overall performance of the product is an area where the tool has certain shortcomings and needs to improve."
"SAP should refine its debugging method, and the process needs to be a little faster. It should use more Pragmas and fewer pseudocomments. I would like if SAP added more features based on advanced technologies, like artificial intelligence and voice control. The modularization and if-else techniques could also incorporate the latest technology to code and solve complex problems. The SAP Editor should be more elaborative, and it should allow many more types of statements for all uses."
"Cost-wise, SAP is still expensive compared to other available products."
"I think that the solution needs to be positioned better within the market as it appears as though the Adaptive Server is being left out of the SAP scope."
"There could be some improvements in barcode scanning and RFID access."
"In my opinion, product support is not that great from SAP because they have already declared the end-of-date for SAP ASE. They will be stopping product support."
"Because the solution is customized. we do occasionally face unique bugs. There are always some changes that need to be made here and there."
"User interface could be more user friendly."
"If the developers were to enhance or improve the application logic while processing the transactions, that would be great."
"The user experience should be better. Its user interface is not good. I also don't like the transition concept."
"They should develop and improve the solution's data management system."
"The JDBC connectors are very slow."
"The solution's development platform should be more flexible and scalable to adapt to other solutions."
"I think that the pricing is high and it needs improvement."
"When you do a report on a non-SAP platform, you face some compatibility problems."
"The performance and integration with other products are areas in need of improvement."
More SAP Adaptive Server Enterprise Pricing and Cost Advice →
SAP Adaptive Server Enterprise is ranked 17th in Relational Databases Tools with 12 reviews while SAP HANA is ranked 3rd in Relational Databases Tools with 81 reviews. SAP Adaptive Server Enterprise is rated 8.4, while SAP HANA is rated 8.4. The top reviewer of SAP Adaptive Server Enterprise writes " Loaded with a lot of features but the price is a drawback ". On the other hand, the top reviewer of SAP HANA writes "Excellent compatibility between modules and the control". SAP Adaptive Server Enterprise is most compared with SQL Server, SAP SQL Anywhere, Oracle Database, IBM Db2 Database and SAP IQ, whereas SAP HANA is most compared with Oracle Database, SQL Server, MySQL, IBM Db2 Database and Oracle Database In-Memory. See our SAP Adaptive Server Enterprise vs. SAP HANA report.
See our list of best Relational Databases Tools vendors.
We monitor all Relational Databases Tools reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.