We performed a comparison between Secureworks Red Cloak Threat Detection and Response [EOL] and VMware Carbon Black Endpoint based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about VMware, ServiceNow, IBM and others in Security Incident Response."The features that I have found most valuable are that the search capabilities are easy to use. The dashboards are good. The reports are good. It is just simple from a deployment standpoint - that was easy."
More Secureworks Red Cloak Threat Detection and Response [EOL] Pros →
"Once the solution is installed and configured correctly it does not require a lot of hands-on attention until you need upgrading."
"It uses machine learning and behavioral analytics for advanced threat detection and response."
"I like its reporting."
"Carbon Black Cb Defense has a nice component called Alert Triage. It contains full details of the process execution "kill chain" and "go live" for immediate remediation."
"Carbon Black Cb Defense improved our endpoint level security. It helped to identify endpoint and infrastructure loopholes."
"Some of the valuable features I have found are the online documentation of the solution is well organized and thorough. I like the simplicity of bypass and the visualization of the active components."
"I found the offline scanning to be particularly useful."
"The new feature that we're deploying, the new offering from Carbon Black, is MDR, which stands for manage, detect, and response. It's the most valuable feature because Carbon Black will be continuously checking the logs, and they will be advising us on how to improve some of the policies as well as review the logs. If there are any nefarious agents or things happening on the end points, they will know."
"There are some automated network response portions that we want to turn up."
More Secureworks Red Cloak Threat Detection and Response [EOL] Cons →
"Sensor deployment requires extensive fine-tuning, and creating deployment packages is time-consuming."
"Carbon Black needs to do a better job of proving their platform in the industry, and providing a bit more access to do industry testing with real world examples to help prove their platform."
"It would be nice to have additional forensic tools that you can build into the back end."
"Integration is difficult, but CB Defense is more powerful than others. It is difficult to implement but easy to pick up many detections."
"There is room for improvement in the support and service team."
"I am not sure whether Carbon Black CB Defense can be considered as a stable solution or not."
"The feature set for the firewall needs improvement."
"A search bar in the investigation page and some AI-related tasks like outgoing alerts, or recent tactics that are being used in the market, must be embedded in the tool so that it's easier to find alerts."
Earn 20 points
Secureworks Red Cloak Threat Detection and Response [EOL] doesn't meet the minimum requirements to be ranked in Security Incident Response while VMware Carbon Black Endpoint is ranked 1st in Security Incident Response with 62 reviews. Secureworks Red Cloak Threat Detection and Response [EOL] is rated 8.0, while VMware Carbon Black Endpoint is rated 8.0. The top reviewer of Secureworks Red Cloak Threat Detection and Response [EOL] writes "Simple deployment with good reports and dashboard". On the other hand, the top reviewer of VMware Carbon Black Endpoint writes "Centralization via the cloud allows us to protect and control people working from home". Secureworks Red Cloak Threat Detection and Response [EOL] is most compared with Cisco SecureX, Splunk SOAR and VMware Carbon Black Cloud, whereas VMware Carbon Black Endpoint is most compared with CrowdStrike Falcon, Microsoft Defender for Endpoint, Trend Micro Deep Security, SentinelOne Singularity Complete and Symantec Endpoint Security.
See our list of best Security Incident Response vendors.
We monitor all Security Incident Response reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
