We performed a comparison between Tenable Security Center and XM Cyber based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Cloud Security Posture Management (CSPM) solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."The most valuable features in Tenable SC are scanning and analysis."
"The tool provides us insight into the happens of the network and its hosts. It provides me with a list of hosts."
"The Auto-Remediate feature is good."
"The solution is very intuitive and the dashboards are simple to use."
"Tenable is the leading product for vulnerability scanning."
"It is a very good and user-friendly product."
"The solution is completely stable and operation is user-friendly."
"Their overall cost of service is pretty good."
"The platform's most valuable feature is attack simulation."
"What I personally like very much, from my experience, is that it is very reliable."
"Security can always be improved."
"If I want to have a very low-managed scan policy, it's a lot of work to create something which is very basic. If I use a tool like Nmap, all I have to do is download it, install it, type in the command, and it's good to go. In Security Center, I have to go through a lot of work to create a policy that's very basic."
"Tenable.sc's user interface could be improved."
"Tenable SC could improve by making the creation of the initial reports easier that correspond to our network."
"It's good at creating information, it's good creating dashboards, it's good at creating reports, but if you want to take that reporting metadata and put it into another tool, that is a little bit lacking."
"Certain aspects require manual effort, such as exporting and analyzing data for our dashboards. The built-in components of the Tenable solution are somewhat clumsy that require external tools. So, this is an area of improvement."
"Its reporting can be improved. It is not easy to generate a scan report the way we want. The data is okay, but we can't easily change the template to make it look the way we want."
"The reporting needs a lot of work on the template."
"XM Cyber could identify all areas of vulnerability. They could expand the identification span for different areas."
"We'd like to see a cheaper price."
Tenable Security Center is ranked 10th in Cloud Security Posture Management (CSPM) with 48 reviews while XM Cyber is ranked 26th in Cloud Security Posture Management (CSPM) with 2 reviews. Tenable Security Center is rated 8.2, while XM Cyber is rated 8.0. The top reviewer of Tenable Security Center writes "A security solution for vulnerability assessment with automated scans". On the other hand, the top reviewer of XM Cyber writes "Reliable with no false-positives and helpful support". Tenable Security Center is most compared with Tenable Vulnerability Management, Qualys VMDR, Rapid7 InsightVM, Tenable Nessus and Microsoft Defender for Cloud, whereas XM Cyber is most compared with Pentera, Cymulate, SafeBreach, Picus Security and Qualys VMDR. See our Tenable Security Center vs. XM Cyber report.
See our list of best Cloud Security Posture Management (CSPM) vendors and best Vulnerability Management vendors.
We monitor all Cloud Security Posture Management (CSPM) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
