We performed a comparison between Trellix Endpoint Security and Trend Micro Apex One based on our users’ reviews in five categories. After reading all of the collected data, you can find our conclusion below.
Features: Trellix Endpoint Security is highly valued for its easy administration options and reliability. Trend Micro Apex One stands out for its centralized reporting, efficient policy implementation, and a diverse array of features including DLP, encryption, and patch management. Reviews suggest that Trellix could reduce resource consumption and improve user-friendliness. Trend Micro Apex One users say the platform should improve its compatibility with different operating systems and address performance issues. Users also say the reporting, forensic analysis, and ransomware features could use some work.
Service and Support: Some users have found the support for Trellix Endpoint Security helpful and reliable, while others have encountered ineffective assistance and communication problems. Trend Micro support generally earned positive reviews, but some said that support could be more proactive and respond faster.
Ease of Deployment: The setup process for Trellix Endpoint Security varies in difficulty, depending on the user's experience with McAfee and general technical expertise. Most users thought Trend Micro Apex One was easy to set up, but a few said that it’s more complex than competing solutions.
Pricing: Some find Trellix’s price reasonable and competitive, while others believe it could be lowered. Some considered the price of Trend Micro Apex One to be fair, while others found it expensive.
ROI: Trellix Endpoint Security provides significant time savings. Trend Micro Apex One provides extra cost-effective advantages and safeguards vital information.
"The most valuable feature is the analysis, because of the beta structure."
"Fortinet has helped free up around 20 percent of our staff's time to help us out."
"he solution is an anti-malware product that integrates well with other vendor products such as firewalls, SIEM, etc. It captures threat intelligence and gives you better visibility. The product also has sandboxing features."
"Additionally, when it comes to EDR, there are more tools available to assist with client work."
"It notifies us if there's any suspicious file on any PC. If any execution or similar kind of thing is happening, it just alerts us. It doesn't only alert. It also blocks the execution until we allow it. We check whether the execution is legitimate or not, and then approve it or keep it blocked. This gives us a little bit of control over this mechanism. Fortinet FortiEDR is also very straightforward and easy to maintain."
"It is very easy to set up. I would rate my experience with the initial setup a ten out of ten, with ten being very easy to set up."
"This is stable and scalable."
"The product detects and blocks threats and is more proactive than firewalls."
"Their malware detection rate is excellent for all type of devices and the anti-theft products are good and easy to use."
"The solution is reliable."
"The detection is great and the solution is constantly improving."
"One valuable feature is Threat Prevention with the on-demand scan."
"Anyone can use it, the protection is good, and they have all of the features."
"The solution offers very good endpoint security."
"It's quite easy to install agents."
"The loss prevention feature would be the most valuable."
"The features that I have found most valuable are the endpoint security with the zero-day vulnerability. They have an on-premise sandboxing solution which prevents any of those zero-day vulnerability issues."
"It has the ability to share, which is not available in other products."
"It is very stable. It also has good security capabilities. It is a strong security product for endpoint protection."
"Trend Micro Apex One is a seamless solution compared to others."
"It is available on our OS platform and will automatically scan our machines daily or weekly."
"Stability is okay."
"The most valuable feature of Trend Vision One Endpoint Security is the virtual patching it provides."
"The AI and machine learning feature is the most valuable because it helps mitigate threats based on an organization's behavioral patterns."
"Intelligence aspects need improvement"
"To improve Fortinet, we need to see more features and technology areas at the endpoint level introduced."
"I think cloud security and SASE are areas of concern in the product where improvements are required. The tool's cloud version has to be improved in terms of the security it offers."
"I would like the solution to extend beyond endpoint protection and include other attack surfaces such as other network components."
"The EDR console should have more extensive reporting. You shouldn't need to purchase FortiAnalyzer. It should be included in the EDR part. The security adviser cloud platform could be improved with more options for exclusive or intensive rules for devices."
"There's room for improvement in the quick response time and technical support for integration issues, especially when dealing with multiple vendors."
"The solution is not stable."
"Making the portal mobile friendly would be helpful when I am out of office."
"I would like this solution to do what Palo Alto traps does because I would only need to run this one product."
"Tech support is not as helpful as they were in the past."
"Patch management is unavailable"
"The solution takes up a high amount of memory and can cause the system to hang."
"It would be nice if the solution were to allow not just on-cloud management, but on-premises, as well."
"It would be helpful if the controlling of connections coming to the PC could be done from McAfee's side so that we can block those connections."
"The product is not easy to use."
"The DAC (Dynamic Application Containment) component of this product needs improvement."
"We have to manually log in to the machines and give them an update command."
"In the next release, I would like to see IBS included in OfficeScan."
"No product can ever be rated a ten out of ten. They are always improving on one aspect or another."
"The solution could improve security. It is important to always keep the organization secure."
"It would be great it can support endpoint encryption."
"The application and web controls have room for improvement."
"We had a few occasions where we had to turn off our clients' computers to upgrade the drivers."
"I think the one place where we like where they lacking is in a unified style dashboard."
More Trend Vision One Endpoint Security Pricing and Cost Advice →
Trellix Endpoint Security is ranked 10th in Endpoint Protection Platform (EPP) with 96 reviews while Trend Vision One Endpoint Security is ranked 6th in Endpoint Protection Platform (EPP) with 125 reviews. Trellix Endpoint Security is rated 8.0, while Trend Vision One Endpoint Security is rated 8.2. The top reviewer of Trellix Endpoint Security writes "Good user behavioral analysis and helpful patching but needs better support services". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Trend Vision One Endpoint Security writes "We can get consolidated logs of suspicious objects and malware attacks in a single console". Trellix Endpoint Security is most compared with Microsoft Defender for Endpoint, Trellix Endpoint Security (ENS), CrowdStrike Falcon, Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Networks and SentinelOne Singularity Complete, whereas Trend Vision One Endpoint Security is most compared with Trend Micro Deep Security, Microsoft Defender for Endpoint, Trend Vision One and Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Networks. See our Trellix Endpoint Security vs. Trend Vision One Endpoint Security report.
See our list of best Endpoint Protection Platform (EPP) vendors.
We monitor all Endpoint Protection Platform (EPP) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.