We performed a comparison between A10 Thunder TPS and Radware DefensePro based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Distributed Denial of Service (DDOS) Protection solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."It is a scalable solution."
"The response time to an attack is instant. We've used some outsourced solutions in the past, out in the cloud, that weren't so quick. But it's all within our control now. We control how fast it mitigates."
"They give us the ability to configure many features for DDoS. There are many items that we can use."
"The primary benefit that we see from their systems is that their filtering technology has the ability to detect and drop the malicious traffic from the legitimate traffic with a high success rate. That, in combination with the very small effort needed to manage their systems, are the two most important benefits to us."
"The solution has reduced the amount of manual intervention required during an attack. We have the inline solution and when it comes to the customers that we have on it, it has saved us some troubleshooting time."
"We can keep track of all the customer's requirements. We can forecast our trails and we can forecast our overall financial things."
"Thunder TPS has automated mitigation and fully managed support in case the device cannot handle the attack. They have engineers available to respond."
"The most valuable feature of A10 Thunder TPS is load balancing."
"The most valuable feature is the ability to create signatures on-demand."
"The pricing is reasonable. It's not overly expensive."
"The reporting is very good and provides us with a comprehensive description of where attacks are emanating from."
"A flexible affordable solution for defense against DDos attacks."
"It offers valuable insights into ongoing and past attacks, aiding in post-incident analysis and continuous improvement of our cybersecurity strategy."
"SSL-based mitigation from DDoS attacks is good from their side. They are capable of preventing SSL-based attacks with certifications and everything loaded onto them."
"The product is very effective and performs well on devices."
"With the secure signature feature, the Radware DefensePro is a big assistance. It is a big help to our customers to improve their productivity and performance. The prompt response from the Radware team is definitely increasing in the new era."
"Its documentation could be better."
"We have had some issues with implementation. So, it is the only area that needs improvement."
"They have a cloud scrubbing feature that redirects the traffic if the on-prem appliance can't accommodate a large amount of traffic but it's not available where we are."
"The upgrade process for the boxes is not efficient. We have to go through the A10 aGalaxy where we have issues, like timeouts. They told me it was fixed in the latest version, but I tried to do it on the Portal and it is not working all the time."
"I would like for them to develop an advanced reporting feature."
"I rate Thunder TPS seven out of 10 for scalability."
"The solution is a little expensive."
"The last issue we had to contact them about was just a question of a false-positive. The A10 system wasn't supposed to decide what is a false-positive. So if we send it good traffic, it's supposed to just pass that good traffic through. But we opened this last ticket because the A10 did block some of the good traffic. Their support had to tweak it a little bit, but it wasn't anything that took a long time."
"They should add artificial intelligence to the platform. It is currently missing the machine learning piece."
"As a service provider, we are expecting the multi-tenancy feature on the dashboard and reporting side. It will help share reports with customers in real-time. They can directly see them online. We are working with their team on API integration with our portal. We will be able to achieve that, but it will take some time."
"APSolute Vision needs to be more granular so that it's possible to get real-time information."
"There's room for improvement in the clarity of the feedback provided by the command service in the CLI."
"The solution is a little more pricey than other options on the market."
"This solution may not cover all of the requirements in situations for which I am unfamiliar, and there is always room for improvement."
"The inability to access local technical support during our business hours poses a significant inconvenience."
"This product would be improved if ongoing live monitoring with dashboards were added."
A10 Thunder TPS is ranked 15th in Distributed Denial of Service (DDOS) Protection with 12 reviews while Radware DefensePro is ranked 4th in Distributed Denial of Service (DDOS) Protection with 23 reviews. A10 Thunder TPS is rated 8.8, while Radware DefensePro is rated 8.4. The top reviewer of A10 Thunder TPS writes "A highly stable solution that can be used for load balancing". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Radware DefensePro writes "Regular signature update with good reporting and analytics". A10 Thunder TPS is most compared with Arbor DDoS, Cloudflare, Corero and Imperva DDoS, whereas Radware DefensePro is most compared with Arbor DDoS, Cloudflare, Imperva DDoS, Fortinet FortiDDoS and F5 BIG-IP Advanced Firewall Manager (AFM). See our A10 Thunder TPS vs. Radware DefensePro report.
See our list of best Distributed Denial of Service (DDOS) Protection vendors.
We monitor all Distributed Denial of Service (DDOS) Protection reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.