We performed a comparison between ABBYY Vantage and Tungsten TotalAgility based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Intelligent Document Processing (IDP) solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."The advantage for ABBYY Vantage is in the visual tools to parameterize and set documents."
"We are able to extract details from a PDF and put them into a CSV. It is able to extract the details that we are looking for. We have the Machine Learning feature to extract the data with respect to the position of the field."
"The solution's technical support is very supportive."
"The most valuable feature of this solution is its ability to extract content from documents. It is able to identify specific fields and special characters."
"It's a very useful and user-friendly product."
"ABBYY Vantage is user-friendly...The deployment process can be done in a few minutes."
"The OTR (Optical Text Recognition) is the most valuable feature of this solution."
"The solution's AI technology is genius."
"What I find most valuable in Kofax TotalAgility is its OCR feature. I also find its workflow and business process management capabilities valuable. Kofax TotalAgility also has good integration with other solutions and has an API call feature."
"Essentially, Kofax TotalAgility as a whole is quite nice. As of now, we've only been able to use and explore its document classification and extraction capabilities. We haven't explored and used the case management capability yet, but the scan and capture capabilities we've been using heavily and those are quite good. Our solutions are mainly around those areas of Kofax TotalAgility. We haven't explored the product a lot, but the capabilities we've explored are good."
"Kofax TotalAgility is a great design tool for reading handwritten invoices."
"The product is really good, and it is easy to use. It comes with multiple integrations. The solution keeps up with the trend of Microsoft Copilot and AI."
"The most valuable features of this solution are automation, ease of billing processes with the process net, and low to no code development."
"It's not so complex to design what you need to."
"The tool is low code which saves you from a developer."
"Great with recognition providing a high level of confidence."
"I think that technical support should help instead of developing a solution from scratch every time you reach out to them."
"The price for trainings or certifications are on the very, very high side."
"The recognition intelligence could improve by having more details in the documents. There are limitations with the forms, templates, and manuscripts."
"It's important to incorporate image detection for signatures or other handwriting elements."
"The system does not always train itself to recognize data properly."
"ABBYY Vantage could improve the processing of handwritten notes."
"It could be more intuitive. It's huge and has many options, and that makes it difficult. You have to go to Google and search for documents and videos to try and understand how it works. Some tools or processes or some parts of the process should be intuitive to make it easier for the developers."
"Initially, it was good, but now, in terms of ease of implementation and accuracy, there are better competitors in the market. What we are seeing in some of the other tools isn't there in ABBYY. They have to improve it to include such features. Otherwise, it will be difficult for them to compete in the market."
"It’s not truly low code yet, as every two or three projects, you will have a situation where you have to go behind the essential things. You will definitely still need to customize."
"The one thing I would like to see more of right now: is a simplified form creation. That would be the most significant improvement I would like to see in their product."
"They provide sufficient but not excellent technical support. Perhaps there is a point where they could use some improvement."
"Sometimes there isn't enough accuracy when it comes to extracts."
"Kofax should improve its handwritten extractions."
"Kofax needs to improve the low-code or citizen developers."
"Room for improvement would be better OCR functionality in terms of Arabic OCR. There should be better accuracy."
"TotalAgility needs to improve communication with ECMs or other file storage systems because TotalAgility does not have file storage. A good improvement would be to create file storage or integrate with other file storage tools that are currently available."
ABBYY Vantage is ranked 1st in Intelligent Document Processing (IDP) with 46 reviews while Tungsten TotalAgility is ranked 4th in Intelligent Document Processing (IDP) with 22 reviews. ABBYY Vantage is rated 8.0, while Tungsten TotalAgility is rated 8.2. The top reviewer of ABBYY Vantage writes "Genius-level AI with very easy setup and implementation processes". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Tungsten TotalAgility writes "Great with recognition and provides a high level of confidence in terms of extraction capabilities". ABBYY Vantage is most compared with UiPath Document Understanding, UiPath, HyperScience, Microsoft Power Automate and OpenText Intelligent Capture, whereas Tungsten TotalAgility is most compared with OpenText Intelligent Capture, UiPath Document Understanding, Tungsten RPA, Hyland Brainware and IBM Datacap. See our ABBYY Vantage vs. Tungsten TotalAgility report.
See our list of best Intelligent Document Processing (IDP) vendors and best Robotic Process Automation (RPA) vendors.
We monitor all Intelligent Document Processing (IDP) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
