We performed a comparison between AlgoSec and Palo Alto Networks Panorama based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Firewall Security Management solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."It has reduced our audit preparation efforts and costs drastically and maintains continuous compliance."
"We use it for global firewall rules management to ensure global policies are applied to all regional firewalls, provide auditing and compliance."
"For us, as well as for our customers, firewall management and change management are the most important features."
"Optimizing the operation making it possible to focus on other improvements."
"We have reduced the attack surface of risky rules, improved our compliance scores, and streamlined our firewall change flow all thanks to AlgoSec Firewall Analyzer."
"We need less time to identify any risks in our firewalls, as we can detect changes in real-time."
"Reporting helps us with deliverables, areas of focus for improvement, and much more."
"It lowers the burden of the security department."
"It has shared profiles for all gateways. If I do not have Panorama, I need to create a separate profile for each and every gateway by logging into that particular gateway, but with Panorama, I can create a shared profile and just push it down to each and every gateway connected to it."
"Especially for big, worldwide clients, one of the most valuable features is being able to create some rules to place on the security groups."
"I found it easy to learn how to pull information from the logs."
"It is really useful for big deployments."
"Centralized firewall management and update management are the most valuable features."
"A valuable feature of Palo Alto Networks Panorama is reporting because it gives you different reports on data, logs, and threats. I also like the centralized firewall management feature of the product."
"I like the quality of this product, and it performs. It's the best solution in the IT business."
"We use the solution for centralized monitoring."
"Having the ability to patch an issue as oppose to upgrading the entire suite."
"The documentation could be better."
"More scope for editing alerts would be a welcome change."
"At the integration point, a manual page could be added to the dashboard where directions about the products are explained in detail."
"We needs object level permissions and application level recertifications."
"A vulnerability management module might be interesting, though not integrated with a third-party vendor. It should be an AlgoSec VM module."
"The risk matrix implementation is not easy from an Excel file, so it would be nice to have a solution for creating it directly within the web interface."
"Needs integration to cloud ITSM tools, such ServiceNow."
"There could be more integrations with third parties."
"Palo Alto Networks Panorama has some bugs that could be fixed."
"We have experienced a few bugs which the team at Palo Alto don't have solutions for."
"In the future, it would be beneficial if Panorama could include a firewall assurance feature similar to Skybox."
"It communicates with remote devices, and sometimes, there is a little bit of delay during its communication with remote devices. There should be real-time communication or updates from the manager to devices."
"The customer support needs to be better."
"Price is probably one of the biggest things that we struggle with, specifically with Palo, and that's across their whole portfolio."
"The alerts in Palo Alto Networks Panorama could improve by integration with other systems, such as a forwarding trigger system. For example, if a customer has their own system it would be helpful to have the alarms integrated."
AlgoSec is ranked 1st in Firewall Security Management with 173 reviews while Palo Alto Networks Panorama is ranked 3rd in Firewall Security Management with 81 reviews. AlgoSec is rated 9.0, while Palo Alto Networks Panorama is rated 8.4. The top reviewer of AlgoSec writes "Helps identify risks, reduce attack surfaces, and streamline policy changes". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Palo Alto Networks Panorama writes "Built-in proxy with the ability to maintain your own policies". AlgoSec is most compared with Tufin Orchestration Suite, FireMon Security Manager, Skybox Security Suite, ManageEngine Firewall Analyzer and Fortinet FortiManager, whereas Palo Alto Networks Panorama is most compared with AWS Firewall Manager, Fortinet FortiGate Cloud, Tufin Orchestration Suite, Skybox Security Suite and FireMon Security Manager. See our AlgoSec vs. Palo Alto Networks Panorama report.
See our list of best Firewall Security Management vendors.
We monitor all Firewall Security Management reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
