We performed a comparison between Amazon S3 and Oracle Database Backup Service based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Public Cloud Storage Services solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."The most valuable features of Amazon S3 are its storage capabilities, security, and integration."
"You don't have to specify your clone, availability clone, or your locations. Everything's over there. They have a receipt for the instance where we have to select the exact location of what we are clicking. The S3 storage capacity is high, and the price is reasonable."
"Cloud infrastructure is the most valuable feature."
"Amazon S3 has multiple types of data detection. You can store data on a monthly basis, yearly basis, and long term basis."
"I don't have any problems with the solution. It's issue-free."
"It's very well secured. We have S3 policies that allow you to write custom policies."
"The solution auto-scales so it is easily scalable."
"It is easy to manage and easy to understand."
"The product's most valuable features are differential and cumulative backup functionality."
"The most valuable feature is the ability to perform encrypted backups after any learning."
"The backup is reliable and intuitive."
"Replication and performance tuning are valuable features."
"Oracle Database Backup Service is an easy-to-use consolidation solution that's dashboard-driven."
"From the database perspective, Oracle is the best."
"The interface is good."
"It's a scalable product."
"The major challenge is the inability to create more than ten policies."
"You do need to get training on the setup process."
"Amazon S3 can improve by decreasing the overall costs."
"An encryption mechanism and storage optimization could be added."
"You need to fully understand the solution's best practices to get the most out of its security features."
"They could always increase object storage ability."
"Amazon S3 should have more frequent updates."
"I would like there to be more support without needing to use Transfer Family."
"We encounter issues while restoring differential and cumulative backups."
"The product can protect from external data penetration, but the in-house IT team can access it."
"It's already fast, but still, they could improve the speed."
"The product's technical support services need improvement in terms of response time."
"They should base their strategy according to the country and the regulations there, and focus more on the on-premises deployment."
"Deployment is overly complex and could be streamlined."
"We cannot use the product with other brands."
"Oracle Database Backup Service is not a cheap solution."
More Oracle Database Backup Service Pricing and Cost Advice →
Amazon S3 is ranked 1st in Public Cloud Storage Services with 70 reviews while Oracle Database Backup Service is ranked 13th in Public Cloud Storage Services with 10 reviews. Amazon S3 is rated 8.8, while Oracle Database Backup Service is rated 8.2. The top reviewer of Amazon S3 writes "Cloud Conversations: AWS S3 Overview". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Oracle Database Backup Service writes "A backup solution for data storage and restoration with point-in-time recover". Amazon S3 is most compared with Oracle Cloud Object Storage, Microsoft Azure File Storage, NetApp Cloud Volumes ONTAP, Amazon S3 Glacier and Azure NetApp Files, whereas Oracle Database Backup Service is most compared with Oracle Cloud Object Storage, Microsoft Azure File Storage, Amazon EFS (Elastic File System), Wasabi and Amazon S3 Glacier. See our Amazon S3 vs. Oracle Database Backup Service report.
See our list of best Public Cloud Storage Services vendors.
We monitor all Public Cloud Storage Services reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
