We performed a comparison between Microsoft Azure File Storage and Oracle Database Backup Service based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Public Cloud Storage Services solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."The storage in this solution is excellent."
"It was easy to set up."
"Very user-friendly and intuitive."
"It was quick to synchronize back from Azure to the on-premise server."
"The initial setup is straightforward and takes approximately twenty minutes."
"The initial setup is fairly easy."
"Azure File Storage gives good value for money, so I don't find it expensive."
"The most valuable aspect of Azure File Storage is that all the features are available in one place."
"The most valuable feature is the ability to perform encrypted backups after any learning."
"From the database perspective, Oracle is the best."
"Oracle Database Backup Service is an easy-to-use consolidation solution that's dashboard-driven."
"The product's most valuable features are differential and cumulative backup functionality."
"The backup is reliable and intuitive."
"It's a scalable product."
"The product works very fast. It automates a lot of operations in the background."
"Replication and performance tuning are valuable features."
"The product’s pricing could be better."
"Firewall rules should be introduced to secure the access date from any virus attacks. Anti-virus should be introduced in the work filtering and document filtering."
"Licensing costs are expensive."
"Microsoft Azure File Storage should improve its pricing."
"It’s a challenge to find the right support person."
"Lacks integration with other platforms."
"Sometimes it takes very long to refresh the information."
"The provider needs to collect more information about the products."
"We encounter issues while restoring differential and cumulative backups."
"It's already fast, but still, they could improve the speed."
"Oracle Database Backup Service is not a cheap solution."
"The product can protect from external data penetration, but the in-house IT team can access it."
"The product's technical support services need improvement in terms of response time."
"They should base their strategy according to the country and the regulations there, and focus more on the on-premises deployment."
"Deployment is overly complex and could be streamlined."
"We cannot use the product with other brands."
More Oracle Database Backup Service Pricing and Cost Advice →
Microsoft Azure File Storage is ranked 3rd in Public Cloud Storage Services with 44 reviews while Oracle Database Backup Service is ranked 13th in Public Cloud Storage Services with 10 reviews. Microsoft Azure File Storage is rated 8.2, while Oracle Database Backup Service is rated 8.2. The top reviewer of Microsoft Azure File Storage writes "Various storage options available, high availability, and quick deployment". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Oracle Database Backup Service writes "A backup solution for data storage and restoration with point-in-time recover". Microsoft Azure File Storage is most compared with Amazon EFS (Elastic File System), Azure NetApp Files, Wasabi, Amazon S3 Glacier and Nutanix Unified Storage, whereas Oracle Database Backup Service is most compared with Oracle Cloud Object Storage, Amazon S3, Amazon EFS (Elastic File System), Wasabi and Amazon S3 Glacier. See our Microsoft Azure File Storage vs. Oracle Database Backup Service report.
See our list of best Public Cloud Storage Services vendors.
We monitor all Public Cloud Storage Services reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
