We performed a comparison between Armis and Tenable Vulnerability Management based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Risk-Based Vulnerability Management solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."The technology is good."
"Armis is a straightforward and user-friendly solution."
"The most valuable feature of the solution is asset tracking."
"The tool is user-friendly and helps to detect vulnerabilities."
"The best feature of the solution is the amount of visibility it provides of the vulnerabilities."
"One of the most valuable features of Tenable.io Vulnerability Management is its exportability, which allows us to conduct risk assessments efficiently."
"The solution is easy to use and configuration is smooth with no complexities."
"It's a recommended tool for penetration testers because it's effective for that purpose."
"It is very stable, and it is updated periodically by adding new vulnerabilities."
"The solution is very simple to use."
"The initial setup is very straightforward."
"They are on a good trajectory as a company and investing in R&D in the right ways."
"Armis doesn't have a back intel feature."
"The solution's vulnerability testing could be improved."
"We have faced issues with the tool's stability."
"We face difficulties in integrating the product with ticketing tools like ServiceNow."
"The solution must be promoted more in the market."
"We'd like to see a bit more user-friendliness."
"They need to have more dependable and faster support."
"The price could be lower."
"I'm not satisfied with the reporting structure."
"More flexibility is required compared to other solutions."
"The shortcoming of the solution that needs improvement is related to its capability to do vulnerability assessments on applications."
"Tenable could improve visibility into assets, including automated asset tagging. You should be able to automatically tag assets based on location, function, ownership, etc. That would help us because we spend a lot of time identifying and tagging assets by hand."
More Tenable Vulnerability Management Pricing and Cost Advice →
Armis is ranked 13th in Risk-Based Vulnerability Management with 4 reviews while Tenable Vulnerability Management is ranked 2nd in Risk-Based Vulnerability Management with 39 reviews. Armis is rated 8.0, while Tenable Vulnerability Management is rated 8.2. The top reviewer of Armis writes "Improves device visibility and adapts according to an organization’s security demands". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Tenable Vulnerability Management writes "Discovers vulnerabilities and integrates well with other solutions". Armis is most compared with Nozomi Networks, Forescout Platform, Axonius, Claroty Platform and Phosphorus Cybersecurity, whereas Tenable Vulnerability Management is most compared with Tenable Security Center, Tenable Nessus, Qualys VMDR, Amazon Inspector and Wiz. See our Armis vs. Tenable Vulnerability Management report.
See our list of best Risk-Based Vulnerability Management vendors.
We monitor all Risk-Based Vulnerability Management reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
