We compared Tenable Nessus and Tenable Vulnerability Management based on our user's reviews in several parameters.
Tenable Nessus is highly praised for its customer service, cost-effectiveness, and valuable cybersecurity enhancements, while Tenable Vulnerability Management is commended for its efficient scanning capabilities and accurate reporting. Users specifically highlight the ease of use of Tenable Nessus and the need for improvements in the user interface and scan speed for Tenable Vulnerability Management.
Features: Tenable Nessus is praised for its comprehensive scanning capabilities and ability to identify and prioritize vulnerabilities, while Tenable Vulnerability Management stands out for its accurate reporting and effective vulnerability prioritization. Users also appreciate the ease of use for both products.
Pricing and ROI: The setup cost for Tenable Nessus is considered relatively low, while Tenable Vulnerability Management has a straightforward and hassle-free setup process. Users appreciate the licensing process of both products, with Tenable Nessus offering a straightforward process and Tenable Vulnerability Management offering flexible options tailored to specific needs., Tenable Nessus provides significant value with its effective vulnerability identification, reliable scanning, comprehensive reporting, and ease of use. Tenable Vulnerability Management excels in efficiency, risk documentation, ease of use, and integration with existing infrastructure.
Room for Improvement: Tenable Nessus has received feedback on areas for improvement, while Tenable Vulnerability Management needs enhancements in user interface, scan speed, customization options, reporting capabilities, and addressing software glitches and false positives.
Deployment and customer support: The users' reviews for Tenable Nessus and Tenable Vulnerability Management show differences in the duration required for establishing a new tech solution. While some users mentioned separate timeframes for deployment and setup for Tenable Vulnerability Management, it is likely that for Tenable Nessus, these terms refer to the same period., Customers have expressed high regard for the customer service and support provided by both Tenable Nessus and Tenable Vulnerability Management. They have praised the effectiveness, responsiveness, and knowledge of the support teams in resolving issues promptly. Customers have also mentioned their satisfaction with the level of assistance and guidance provided.
The summary above is based on 64 interviews we conducted recently with Tenable Nessus and Tenable Vulnerability Management users. To access the review's full transcripts, download our report.
"Tenable Nessus streamlines the process of scanning for our organization."
"We looked at Tenable, Qualys and Rapid7. We found Tenable was the best of all three."
"It also has an executive report where you don't have to provide the client all the detail for them to sift though. But if they wish to dig through the detail they can."
"The most valuable feature of Tenable Nessus is real-time monitoring."
"I have experience with it on my attack stations, and it's pretty good to optimize. Personally, I think Nessus is quite a good product."
"The most valuable aspect of this solution is that you receive the entire report, which details the breakdown, especially in terms of critical, high, low, and mediums."
"The initial setup is very straightforward."
"The most valuable feature of Tenable Nessus is website scanning."
"A new user can easily understand the workflow, even if they are creating users for other divisions and the user is a beginner."
"The most valuable feature for me is container scanning because I am interested in CICD security."
"It is pretty stable. I would rate it nine or maybe ten."
"Tenable.io Vulnerability Management is an easy-to-use product. I"
"The initial setup is mostly straightforward."
"I would rate Tenable's dashboards and reporting capabilities for illustrating security posture a nine out of ten, with ten being the best."
"It is easy to manage. Most of the information the tool provided helped to further investigate the vulnerability and its impact."
"The integration of Tenable into our security ecosystem was very good."
"The solution should be able to support more devices."
"Multiple steps to create an actionable plan will be a great addition to Nessus."
"Tenable Nessus could improve by having more steady updates which will reduce the vulnerabilities."
"The price and scalability of the solution could improve."
"The features are limited when it comes to scanning network devices for vulnerabilities."
"There is room, overall, for improvement in the way it groups the workstations and the way it detects, when the vulnerability is scanned. Even when we would run a new scan, if it was an already existing vulnerability, it wouldn't put a new date on it."
"The reporting is a bit cumbersome."
"The professional version is not very scalable."
"It would be helpful if Tenable could be more clear with regard to everything the solution can and cannot do with the particular license that you have."
"The interface could be improved; right now it's running on two interfaces simultaneously."
"Tenable.io Vulnerability Management could be improved with an increased number of dashboards and MSSP integration."
"They should include better customization of the dashboard, and integration tools."
"It can have more integration."
"The tool's reports are bad. They're not very customizable or flexible. During audits, we often have to exclude things that aren't relevant to our organization, but we can't do that easily with the reports. They come in HTML or PDF format, and we can't compare current results with previous ones in Excel because we never receive reports in Excel."
"Users get confused between VPR and CVSS ratings."
"The user interface could be improved by being able to change the user interface to fit your position or your job. The graphs are set in stone and you can only print reports."
More Tenable Vulnerability Management Pricing and Cost Advice →
Tenable Nessus is ranked 3rd in Vulnerability Management with 75 reviews while Tenable Vulnerability Management is ranked 2nd in Vulnerability Management with 39 reviews. Tenable Nessus is rated 8.4, while Tenable Vulnerability Management is rated 8.2. The top reviewer of Tenable Nessus writes "Unlimited assets for one price and quick, agentless results". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Tenable Vulnerability Management writes "Discovers vulnerabilities and integrates well with other solutions". Tenable Nessus is most compared with Qualys VMDR, Rapid7 InsightVM, Tenable Security Center, Pentera and Microsoft Defender Vulnerability Management, whereas Tenable Vulnerability Management is most compared with Tenable Security Center, Qualys VMDR, Amazon Inspector, Microsoft Defender Vulnerability Management and Rapid7 InsightVM. See our Tenable Nessus vs. Tenable Vulnerability Management report.
See our list of best Vulnerability Management vendors.
We monitor all Vulnerability Management reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
Tenable Nessus is a vulnerability assessment solution that is both easy to deploy and easy to manage. The design of the program is such that if a company should desire to handle the installation themselves, they would be able to do so. The updates that the program requires to keep up-to-date take up a large portion of the setup time. Tenable Nessus can be deployed in under an hour. The speed of an organization’s internet can impact how quickly the deployment will go. Furthermore, once it has been set up, only a small management team is necessary for maintenance. Tenable Nessus is an incredibly important program that provides businesses and organizations with robust protection. This ease of deployment and management gives it an edge over the competition.
Tenable.io Vulnerability Management is basically comparable to Tenable Nessus in regards to setup and management. It is relatively straightforward to set up. A single person could deploy it in a non-business setting in a matter of hours. The setup can be handled without requiring a business to rely on the help of outside consultants. As with Tenable Nessus, a small team of two or three people is all that is necessary to manage the solution. Organizations can save a great deal of time and resources by choosing to utilize this solution.
Tenable Nessus is a solution with good scalability. This can be accomplished with relative ease. However, the load that it can handle makes it a poor fit for larger organizations. At a certain point, the farther up you scale it, the more the solution quality diminishes.
Tenable.io Vulnerability Management is able to offer a much higher level of scalability. It is typically used without trouble by organizations with many thousands of users. As with Tenable Nessus, the process is relatively simple.
Conclusion:
The actual difference in time and ease as far as deploying Tenable Nessus versus Tenable.io Vulnerability Management is negligible and cannot truly set one apart from the other. Ease of management is another area where these two solutions are very similar. A major difference between them is their scalability. While both can be scaled relatively easily, Tenable.io Vulnerability Management is able to handle a higher level of scalability, with the diminishment of quality being a far lesser concern than is the case with Tenable Nessus.