We performed a comparison between Aruba Boost Unified WAN Optimization and Aruba EdgeConnect SD-WAN Platform based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about HPE Aruba Networking, Cato Networks, Riverbed and others in WAN Optimization."The platform’s features for latency mitigation help optimize user experience."
"Silver Peak Unity EdgeConnect has high availability."
"The tool's most valuable feature is bandwidth optimization."
"The most valuable feature is the support for asymmetric lines."
"The file and data reduction capabilities are very good. Without it, we have a great deal of network congestion."
"We had several clients that were paying $7,500 a month for an MPLS line for one single 10 megabit circuit and we were able to take that from $7,500 a month down to $500 a month for two 10 megabits circuits that added redundancy where before they did not have redundancy and it gave them a much better throughput."
"It is a scalable solution."
"I really love the auto-tunnel creation feature."
"The platform is valuable for bandwidth reduction."
"Currently, we encounter challenges in terms of the functioning of compression, deduplication, and other features even after uploading the certificate for encrypted traffic."
"The license features should improve in the solution. For example, when you purchase VMware, it starts at a low level that has some functionality. When you want to expand, the difference in the price is substantial. I purchased the lower functional version for $4,000, and now if I want to upgrade, they ask me for $80,000. This is a $76,000 difference, there's no logic, but this is VMware."
"They have to implement more security with it. The security, mainly their firewall functions, have to be included in the firewall features."
"The security can be improved, with the firewall for example, because they supply a basic one but not a UTM."
"If compared with Cisco, then Aruba's pricing is very aggressive."
"Their WAN optimization in terms of wireless connectivity doesn't have a very good cellular capability."
"Aruba EdgeConnect SD-WAN Platform’s stability and technical features need improvement."
"We would like to have better features for path selection. For example, if we know the network is going to go down then we would like to set up an alternate route for data packets in real-time."
"There are some functional limitations that could improve."
More Aruba Boost Unified WAN Optimization Pricing and Cost Advice →
More Aruba EdgeConnect SD-WAN Platform Pricing and Cost Advice →
Aruba Boost Unified WAN Optimization is ranked 12th in WAN Optimization with 1 review while Aruba EdgeConnect SD-WAN Platform is ranked 1st in WAN Optimization with 19 reviews. Aruba Boost Unified WAN Optimization is rated 0.0, while Aruba EdgeConnect SD-WAN Platform is rated 8.6. The top reviewer of Aruba Boost Unified WAN Optimization writes "Easy-to-deploy with valuable features for web optimization ". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Aruba EdgeConnect SD-WAN Platform writes "Flexible, efficient, and responsive support". Aruba Boost Unified WAN Optimization is most compared with , whereas Aruba EdgeConnect SD-WAN Platform is most compared with Cisco SD-WAN, Fortinet FortiGate, VMware SD-WAN, Prisma SD-WAN and Cato SASE Cloud Platform.
See our list of best WAN Optimization vendors.
We monitor all WAN Optimization reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.