We performed a comparison between Atlassian Crowd and Okta Workforce Identity based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Single Sign-On (SSO) solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."The most valuable features are predominantly in the directory and development spaces."
"One standout feature is the capability to configure various authentication and authorization methods from diverse user directories."
"One of the features that I have found to be very valuable is its interoperability and compatibility with all types of resources, whether it's networking, infrastructure, or applications. That is, it is compatible as well as interoperable, as far as the federated authentication is concerned."
"Its simplicity and its integration with various vendor-agnostic platforms are the most valuable features."
"Okta controls all the users. It has context-based access from the user and type of device. It identifies the risk and can do a step of authentication when that user is trying to access some sensitive application from an unknown device."
"Okta Workforce Identity is easy to use and has a lot of components."
"This solution has a lot of capabilities and features."
"We face no challenges in integrating the product with our legacy systems."
"It offers very helpful support. The technical team is very helpful."
"It has a wide range of MFA options. I prefer "Okta Verify" out of them all."
"There's a need for effective group membership management, especially for corporate programs."
"It makes you more efficient, but you have to optimize what you're doing before you get into the software."
"The only area of concern in the solution stems from the fact that my company needs some help regarding the setup phase from a partner."
"Its pricing needs improvement."
"It would be pricing, which is a tough one because it goes against Microsoft. A lot of companies say they're a Microsoft partner, and they get all their software for free. Okta is like a luxury product, and it's not the most affordable one. I would say if they could work on pricing, it would help. Other than that, they've done great strides in developing a product that is really good. The companies that do see the value tend to invest in it."
"Application updates are lacking. Customer support needs to be improved."
"The solution can be quite expensive."
"Okta doesn't have a partial push. It pushes down the full profile schema for lifecycle management or provisioning."
"The stability could be better."
"The pricing could be improved."
Atlassian Crowd is ranked 17th in Single Sign-On (SSO) with 4 reviews while Okta Workforce Identity is ranked 3rd in Single Sign-On (SSO) with 59 reviews. Atlassian Crowd is rated 9.2, while Okta Workforce Identity is rated 8.4. The top reviewer of Atlassian Crowd writes "Enhanced user management offering seamless single sign-on, scalability for large enterprises, and improved configurability through integration with various user sources and directories". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Okta Workforce Identity writes "Extremely easy to work with, simple to set up, and reasonably priced ". Atlassian Crowd is most compared with , whereas Okta Workforce Identity is most compared with Microsoft Entra ID, Google Cloud Identity, SailPoint Identity Security Cloud, Saviynt and Auth0. See our Atlassian Crowd vs. Okta Workforce Identity report.
See our list of best Single Sign-On (SSO) vendors.
We monitor all Single Sign-On (SSO) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.