We performed a comparison between Atlassian SourceTree and Bitbucket based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Version Control solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."The solution's initial setup process is straightforward."
"The interface is very good and is easy to use. It tells you when you've committed, when you've uploaded, and gives you the differences."
"The initial setup is straightforward."
"The most valuable feature is the ability to fix a broken repository merge."
"The most valuable feature of Bitbucket is its issue management."
"Bitbucket works, and it's reliable"
"Bitbucket works fine for what I'm doing. It's slightly different from GitHub, but it's a good tool for storing code."
"The setup of Bitbucket is simple."
"We use Bitbucket for Jira, Confluence, and Jenkins and we have an automation pipeline. Whenever the coaching is done in Bitbucket we run an automation pipeline from the build, create installations, and tests all in one pipeline. It is done automatically."
"Bitbucket is significantly cheaper compared to GitHub and it provides on-premises hosting."
"Bitbucket is a standard git implementation with perfectly coordinated screens, it's secure, and we have had no problems with it."
"It is easy to write code and store it in the central repository."
"I have had a food experience with Atlassian SourceTree but it might not be for everyone."
"The product's UI needs improvement."
"For everyday use, I am more comfortable using the command line interface, rather than using SourceTree."
"Its interface could be easy to understand for a programmer."
"I think the developers are constantly working on improving the pull requests support."
"Technical support is not very fast."
"It would be beneficial to have a straightforward mechanism for integrating the initial tasks defined in Bitbucket with Jira when the need arises."
"We need an improved automation feature for the cloud."
"Bitbucket's Initial setup is a little complicated because you need to install and configure the solution. It can take one or two days to deploy Bitbucket. If you have a high workload, you can deploy it on multiple server farms as needed"
"I rate the support from Bitbucket a four out of five."
"There could be more AI features included in the product."
"Even with the automation, we've had some situations where we've had mistakes. They've integrated things into the wrong place, so there's a fairly steep learning curve."
Atlassian SourceTree is ranked 6th in Version Control with 5 reviews while Bitbucket is ranked 1st in Version Control with 42 reviews. Atlassian SourceTree is rated 7.2, while Bitbucket is rated 8.4. The top reviewer of Atlassian SourceTree writes "An easy-to-setup solution, but its documentation could be better for technical support". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Bitbucket writes "It's a good solution for storing code, but the usability and integration could be better". Atlassian SourceTree is most compared with Git, GitHub, Bitbucket Server and AWS CodeCommit, whereas Bitbucket is most compared with Bitbucket Server, AWS CodeCommit, GitHub, IBM Rational ClearCase and Liquibase. See our Atlassian SourceTree vs. Bitbucket report.
See our list of best Version Control vendors.
We monitor all Version Control reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.