We performed a comparison between Atlassian SourceTree and Git based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Version Control solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."The most valuable feature is the ability to fix a broken repository merge."
"The interface is very good and is easy to use. It tells you when you've committed, when you've uploaded, and gives you the differences."
"The solution's initial setup process is straightforward."
"The initial setup is straightforward."
"The product is easy to use."
"Stability-wise, I rate the solution a ten out of ten...Since I am a very simple user of the tool, its scalability is good for me."
"The best thing about this solution is that it can be learned very quickly, and used very easily."
"Git is an easy-to-use solution that can be used for parallel working."
"The most valuable feature of Git is its reliability and user popularity."
"The tool's most valuable feature is branch workflows."
"I like that it's easy to use and because it's accessible from a terminal or a graphical user interface if needed. I also like that we can pass comments from Linux if required."
"Git is a powerful and mature tool that all software engineers use, whether they use it from the command line with the original version or integrate it with various tools. It helps by promoting collaboration and eliminating problems with code in separate locations. This greatly boosts productivity since you're not lost in a massive local repository, and everything remains organized."
"Its interface could be easy to understand for a programmer."
"I have had a food experience with Atlassian SourceTree but it might not be for everyone."
"For everyday use, I am more comfortable using the command line interface, rather than using SourceTree."
"The product's UI needs improvement."
"If the file changes are on the same line, we need to resolve a merge conflict manually. Let's say there is a merge conflict on line 50 because we have multiple commits on the same line number. Git could add some artificial intelligence to resolve the conflict automatically."
"Git is mostly command based and needs to have a helpful user interface."
"The GUI needs to be improved."
"In our company, we sometimes feel the need to have certain kinds of reports, but we never get those customized reports in Git's dashboard."
"Some challenges arise when Git is not used correctly, particularly in managing branches. It's easy to get lost, but these challenges can be overcome with proper management. A common advice is maintaining the repository and ensuring developers are in sync with the production branch. Branches should be promptly merged into development to avoid getting lost in many branches."
"It would be preferable if the updates could be completed at a faster pace."
"In a future release, the user interface should be easier to use and more intuitive."
"The UI can be more user-friendly."
Atlassian SourceTree is ranked 6th in Version Control with 5 reviews while Git is ranked 4th in Version Control with 37 reviews. Atlassian SourceTree is rated 7.2, while Git is rated 8.6. The top reviewer of Atlassian SourceTree writes "An easy-to-setup solution, but its documentation could be better for technical support". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Git writes "A stable solution that can aid its users in maintaining all application developments ". Atlassian SourceTree is most compared with GitHub, Bitbucket, Bitbucket Server and AWS CodeCommit, whereas Git is most compared with Canonical Bazaar, Surround SCM, IBM Rational ClearCase, Helix Core and Liquibase. See our Atlassian SourceTree vs. Git report.
See our list of best Version Control vendors.
We monitor all Version Control reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
