We performed a comparison between AuraQuantic and Bizagi based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Process Automation solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."AuraQuantic's most valuable features are the zero code, user-friendly mode, and integration."
"AuraPortal has the best price for its process."
"AuraPortal is very user-friendly and flexible."
"It's a low-code application."
"The documentation capabilities are very good. Very structured documents and process versions are valuable features, and being able to communicate that to our customers is also a very good feature. It has a good balance between the effort and the result. So, you don't need to be too detailed. You can document while you are modeling, which is a very good feature."
"It is easy to use and easy to learn. It is also fully compatible with BPMN virtual tool. Bizagi is very fast in responding to and fixing the issues."
"Process management is easy with Bizagi; validating processes and assigning resources is straightforward."
"Your team can work on it having basic training about databases and BPM modeling."
"The ability to write our own code inside each activity is beneficial. Sometimes we need to create functionality that doesn't come out of the box, and this allows us to do that."
"This solution is easy to use and it is a good tool for process modeling."
"The solution's simulation capabilities are the most valuable aspects."
"Very user friendly and a professional solution."
"We'd like it more animated. It would be useful if we could integrate GIFs, for example."
"More documentation and the ability to extract different reports about different relations in the objects I use will help."
"AuraQuantic's price could be improved."
"One thing that could be improved would be for it to be deployed in a shorter time."
"The gateway through which it connects with other vendors, specifically RPA vendors, is one aspect that could be improved."
"Bizagi's UI should include shorter steps for documenting controls, documenting properties, changing some attributes in the object, and adding additional text."
"It needs an easier setup for the Bizagi Engine."
"The tool is expensive and it should improve its pricing."
"Sometimes, when your process is big with multiple lanes, the product will freeze the issue noticed on multiple laptops, not a single PC."
"The product must make automation easier."
"For the small business, this is very bad because it is still fragmented. The licensing policy should be more flexible and small company oriented. In micro-small companies, there should only be one or two. That's not the problem. Maybe it is too flexible, there are so many pieces that you need to put together. When you have a small business, it can be a little complicated, not so easy."
"Framework approach, which extends to reusability in tools, like Pega, for deployment management could be improved."
AuraQuantic is ranked 18th in Process Automation with 6 reviews while Bizagi is ranked 6th in Process Automation with 78 reviews. AuraQuantic is rated 8.8, while Bizagi is rated 8.4. The top reviewer of AuraQuantic writes "Responsive support, easy to use, and reliable". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Bizagi writes "A flexible, customizable solution that reduced time to market, but the UI and customer support could be better". AuraQuantic is most compared with Appian and Camunda, whereas Bizagi is most compared with Camunda, Visio, Bonita, ARIS BPA and Microsoft Power Apps. See our AuraQuantic vs. Bizagi report.
See our list of best Process Automation vendors, best Business Process Management (BPM) vendors, and best Low-Code Development Platforms vendors.
We monitor all Process Automation reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.