We performed a comparison between AWS IAM Identity Center and Fortinet FortiAuthenticator based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about Microsoft, Cisco, Ping Identity and others in Single Sign-On (SSO)."The product is easy for beginners to learn and use."
"The product’s most valuable feature is integration with FortiGate, FortiToken, FortiTalk, and multi-factor authentication."
"FortiAuthenticator is a very good solution. It is all jury-based. FortiAuthenticator is very easy for anyone to understand how it works and be able to take action."
"The feature I value the most is the one-time passwords because it helps to authenticate users so you know the timing of their usage."
"The initial setup is a valuable point on Fortinet products. Most of the time, putting the theory into practice on the devices is quite friendly and straightforward. As long as you can read English you can find your way around the solution and make it work. This is a high value point on Fortinet - the way everything is laid out in the web UI is user-friendly and quite straightforward. The UI is quite simple."
"The product's on-premise version doesn't have recurring costs."
"We have not had issues with Fortinet FortiAuthenticator. It is stable."
"The product enables SSO."
"I prefer the passing tool that sent an active directory console to a Fortinet FortiAuthenticator, then Fortinet FortiAuthenticator does not pass the locks."
"In the product, two groups cannot have the same name...In general, the tool does not allow for the duplication of names."
"There are some protocols, such as SHA and SHA-2, that are not supported."
"FortiAuthenticator's interface could be better."
"The product must provide full support for third-party FIDO security keys."
"The user interface and clustering are areas with shortcomings that need improvement."
"It can not use SQL to query FortiAnalyzer directly."
"The product must provide 2FA for applications."
"There is a room for improvement. The log is a bit difficult to access, and searching the log codes is also a bit difficult. So it would be much better if, when we open a log, it could provide detailed information about errors, reasons for failure, and such."
"It would be helpful to receive a code by yourself for authentication instead of it registered to a phone."
AWS IAM Identity Center is ranked 14th in Single Sign-On (SSO) with 1 review while Fortinet FortiAuthenticator is ranked 6th in Single Sign-On (SSO) with 52 reviews. AWS IAM Identity Center is rated 9.0, while Fortinet FortiAuthenticator is rated 8.0. The top reviewer of AWS IAM Identity Center writes "Helps users provide or revoke accesses whenever needed". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Fortinet FortiAuthenticator writes "A reasonably priced solution that can be scaled toward different functionalities and offers flexible SMS messaging". AWS IAM Identity Center is most compared with Microsoft Entra ID, Red Hat Single Sign On and Ping Identity Platform, whereas Fortinet FortiAuthenticator is most compared with Cisco ISE (Identity Services Engine), Fortinet FortiNAC, Fortinet FortiToken, Cisco Duo and Microsoft Entra ID.
See our list of best Single Sign-On (SSO) vendors.
We monitor all Single Sign-On (SSO) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.