We performed a comparison between Boomi iPaaS and Mule Anypoint Platform based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Integration Platform as a Service (iPaaS) solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."AtomSphere Integration will suit those looking for small automation and simple integrations."
"The iPaaS functionality is very mature. The browser based IDE is also very mature and stable."
"The solution has a lot of connectors, which is quite helpful."
"This solution has a user-friendly interface and very good documentation with solutions that helped us in working with the tool efficiently."
"I like the tool's optimization feature."
"The product's initial setup phase was easy."
"The tool's most valuable features I've found are related to debugging and testing. It makes it easy to track execution, documents, and process history. This functionality is particularly useful for identifying issues with data and providing insights to the business."
"The most valuable feature of the solution is its monitoring part to debug certain issues and find problems."
"The most valuable features of the Mule Anypoint Platform are the Flex Gateway, API management, easy-to-use, and connectors. Additionally, they are coming out with improvements to the solution when required."
"The flexibility has been great overall."
"It's easy to develop APIs."
"The monitoring capabilities of this product are very good because of the feedback it supplies in statistics."
"Mule Anypoint Platform is our preferred platform for integration."
"The tool's visual features are attractive."
"The most valuable feature is the variety of characters Anypoint Platform has. It is very scalable and customizable."
"The solution's deployment and proxy processes are very good."
"In my experience, I haven't encountered any major issues with the tool. However, there could be a learning curve for new users, especially depending on which tool you're using. For example, I've used MuleSoft in the past, which is more code-oriented and requires knowledge of Java. Transitioning to Boomi AtomSphere Integration took me a couple of months because of differences in terminology."
"Boomi AtomSphere Integration is not yet exposed to the world as a good product owing to certain shortcomings in the area of marketing where improvements are required."
"There should be more scripting possibilities."
"The solution is complex. There's a few items and features that are hard to understand. They should work to simplify the functionality so new users don't struggle."
"We would like to see more involvement between Dell Boomi and the end-users to help improve the customer experience."
"In day-to-day operations, tracking transactions is a major challenge. It takes hours to track a single transaction. It is not a straightforward process."
"There are more mature (dedicated) API management and master data management (MDM) solutions available in the market."
"We encountered stability issues occasionally, one to two times a year."
"Although the solution's proxy design and process are good, it faces connecting issues because it lacks data integration."
"Price-wise, it is a good product since it is reasonably priced...Mule Anypoint Platform can get too complex for non-technical people."
"What I hear from my customers is that it's very expensive compared to the cost of other integration suites. The cost keeps increasing. MuleSoft should come up with customization factors by using a different way of getting the cost-related stuff to attract customers. That is, they should come up with some cost optimizations."
"Technical support needs to be improved, especially when you need help with more technical aspects of the solution."
"The terms of use and how it's priced has become very difficult to manage, which is forcing us to look for alternatives already - and we haven't even been using it for that long just yet."
"The solution is very expensive. They need to work on the pricing."
"I would like to see some data integration and automation."
"The compatibility with vendors can be improved. Microsoft Azure heavily uses single software."
Boomi iPaaS is ranked 5th in Integration Platform as a Service (iPaaS) with 25 reviews while Mule Anypoint Platform is ranked 1st in Integration Platform as a Service (iPaaS) with 41 reviews. Boomi iPaaS is rated 7.8, while Mule Anypoint Platform is rated 8.2. The top reviewer of Boomi iPaaS writes "Stable product, suitable for limited integrations and lacks flexibility ". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Mule Anypoint Platform writes "Robust, reliable, and stable, ensuring high availability for critical integrations". Boomi iPaaS is most compared with Microsoft Azure Logic Apps, webMethods Integration Server, SSIS, Oracle Integration Cloud Service and TIBCO BusinessWorks, whereas Mule Anypoint Platform is most compared with MuleSoft Composer, Microsoft Azure Logic Apps, SAP Process Orchestration, Oracle Integration Cloud Service and SAP Cloud Platform. See our Boomi iPaaS vs. Mule Anypoint Platform report.
See our list of best Integration Platform as a Service (iPaaS) vendors.
We monitor all Integration Platform as a Service (iPaaS) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.