We performed a comparison between Cambium Networks Wireless WAN and Cisco Wireless WAN based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Wireless WAN solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."The performance is very good."
"Cambium Networks' PowerMax feature has been particularly beneficial for WAN connectivity, offering superior coverage compared to other solutions. The standout feature of Cambium Networks for me is its extensive coverage area."
"It's a good product and works well when there is a lot of interference."
"One could say that Cambium is a scalable solution."
"It is highly scalable. I would rate the scalability a ten out of ten."
"The claim management feature is exceedingly simple."
"Technical support has been good."
"The feature that I really liked is the mesh feature. Currently, we are in quarantine, and the request of home users is that they need to cover the whole house or the whole indoor house. Mesh solution works really nice in Cambium environment. Being able to set up access points in advance is a good feature. It lets you set up the whole environment in your lab or any other place before deploying the access points."
"The most valuable features are CleanAir, Rogue Detection, and the auto-calculation of RF."
"Mobile anchoring and graphic user interface are helpful features."
"We have found that the product scales well."
"We used everything Cisco, not just wireless. It works great with other Cisco tools."
"It's a small feature, but Cisco allows me to see access points with blinking lights. This shows me which access point is which."
"Provides good visibility and insights into what is happening."
"The solution also allows us to increase the power when it's too low."
"Stability is one aspect that I find very valuable."
"The installation and configuration are a bit complex."
"The range of the product is disappointing so far."
"There is room for improvement in the support."
"The Wifi coverage and throughput performance of Cambium could improve."
"The modulation could be optimized for better performance, and the configuration should be made adaptive to ensure dynamic adjustments as needed."
"Pricing tends to be higher than its competitors."
"The installation is difficult."
"If it's in a warehouse, it is very hard to deploy."
"The pricing of the solution could always be better."
"The price of Cisco Wireless WAN could improve, it is expensive."
"The firewall integration is not great."
"The network management system is not great."
"Technical support could be more helpful."
"The coverage area on some of the low-end access points isn't the best. The high-end ones are fine, but we've had bad experiences on the other ones."
"Cisco Wireless WAN would be improved with the ability to monitor new usernames, product registrations, and flow traffic."
"We have had some problems connecting to the internet with Cisco Wireless WAN, but it is not the equipment or configuration. Additionally, the integration with access control security could improve."
More Cambium Networks Wireless WAN Pricing and Cost Advice →
Cambium Networks Wireless WAN is ranked 3rd in Wireless WAN with 24 reviews while Cisco Wireless WAN is ranked 4th in Wireless WAN with 61 reviews. Cambium Networks Wireless WAN is rated 8.6, while Cisco Wireless WAN is rated 8.2. The top reviewer of Cambium Networks Wireless WAN writes "Provides point-to-point and point-to-multipoint connectivity and user-friendly solution". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Cisco Wireless WAN writes "Widely available and has a straightforward setup". Cambium Networks Wireless WAN is most compared with Ubiquiti Wireless, Ruckus Wireless WAN and Aruba Networks Wireless WAN, whereas Cisco Wireless WAN is most compared with Fortinet FortiExtender and Ubiquiti Wireless. See our Cambium Networks Wireless WAN vs. Cisco Wireless WAN report.
See our list of best Wireless WAN vendors.
We monitor all Wireless WAN reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.