We performed a comparison between Cambium Networks Wireless WAN and Ruckus Wireless WAN based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Wireless WAN solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."The claim management feature is exceedingly simple."
"The feature that I really liked is the mesh feature. Currently, we are in quarantine, and the request of home users is that they need to cover the whole house or the whole indoor house. Mesh solution works really nice in Cambium environment. Being able to set up access points in advance is a good feature. It lets you set up the whole environment in your lab or any other place before deploying the access points."
"The product's scalability features are good."
"What I find valuable is the fact that you don't need to purchase any license. Basically you just get the hardware for the access points, configure an IP and connect it with a switch."
"The pricing of the product is very, very reasonable."
"The most valuable features for network performance in the solution are reliability and centralized management through a single controller."
"It is a stable solution."
"It is easy to deploy and has many specialists to help us handle complicated processes."
"The feature I like most, is the product activity."
"We found the technical support to be helpful."
"The deployment access in the local system is about 200 access points. External access points is more. The number is huge. There about 1,000 users in total."
"The solution is suitable for many types of environments, such as small businesses."
"The solution can scale well."
"I made some comparisons with other competitors and I found that Ruckus was number one in regards to stability."
"The connectivity, speed, and reliability are very good."
"Ruckus Wireless WAN is simple to use. Its coverage is better than other tools."
"The installation is difficult."
"Cambium Networks Wireless WAN is stable but sometimes the 2.4 gigahertz network is sometimes not as stable as the 5 gigahertz. The 5 gigahertz works smoothly with everything, but 2.4 has some problems. If we change the configuration I am not sure if it would fix the problem."
"Cambium Networks Wireless WAN could improve by providing a better signal range."
"One drawback is that Cambium's on-premises controller needs internet connectivity for installation, which can be a problem for clients who want it offline."
"The solution needs to add an LTE solution and/or something in 3.5GHz."
"The Wifi coverage and throughput performance of Cambium could improve."
"The modulation could be optimized for better performance, and the configuration should be made adaptive to ensure dynamic adjustments as needed."
"The installation and configuration are a bit complex."
"I would like to have a better built-in reporting feature."
"It would be nice to some analytical features built into this solution."
"The pricing needs to be reconsidered because it's expensive."
"The pricing of Ruckus Wireless WAN is an area of concern. Ruckus Wireless WAN should slash its current price to match the prices offered by its competitors."
"Ruckus Wireless WAN needs to improve its pricing."
"Of course, we'd always like it to be cheaper, but that's for every product."
"The captive portal should be more customizable because right now, it is very limited."
"The controller could be made less complicated, so those who are less technically sound can maintain it."
More Cambium Networks Wireless WAN Pricing and Cost Advice →
Cambium Networks Wireless WAN is ranked 3rd in Wireless WAN with 24 reviews while Ruckus Wireless WAN is ranked 2nd in Wireless WAN with 45 reviews. Cambium Networks Wireless WAN is rated 8.6, while Ruckus Wireless WAN is rated 8.2. The top reviewer of Cambium Networks Wireless WAN writes "Provides point-to-point and point-to-multipoint connectivity and user-friendly solution". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Ruckus Wireless WAN writes " Offers robust outdoor connectivity, but signal strength and support need improvement". Cambium Networks Wireless WAN is most compared with Ubiquiti Wireless, Cisco Wireless WAN and Aruba Networks Wireless WAN, whereas Ruckus Wireless WAN is most compared with Ubiquiti Wireless. See our Cambium Networks Wireless WAN vs. Ruckus Wireless WAN report.
See our list of best Wireless WAN vendors.
We monitor all Wireless WAN reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.