We performed a comparison between Camunda and OpenText 360 for SharePoint based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Business Process Management (BPM) solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."The most valuable feature is that, with a visual system, you can try to have a process client before beginning the programming for the application."
"We have the ability to modify the product if we need to, and that comes in handy whenever we need to add new functionality and features."
"Camunda's most valuable feature is its ability to integrate with different products."
"It is simple to use. The user experience is very good."
"The most valuable features are the management of internal processes, the ability to execute from design and the model for internal processes, the ability to make processes visible, and the ability to have information about the current state of each instance."
"Provides an easy way to integrate with the architectural environment."
"We are documenting all of the processors and VPN. Then we are sharing it with our business users."
"The most valuable features are the workflow, the task list, and the modeler where we use VPN."
"The fact that you can see and create something that fits your business is the most valuable thing in this platform. It is a customizable product, so it fits your needs."
"The collaborative environment for long-term archival or record management is great."
"It has a lot of flexibility, and Microsoft does come up with some new additions from time to time."
"OpenText 360's best features are platform independence and its performance when searching large numbers of documents."
"The most valuable features are collaboration, traceability, retention of documents, and search."
"We have manual processes, so the workflow enables us to automate a number of these processes."
"This solution has good connection and we do not need to migrate everything in order to protect the repository."
"In terms of its most valuable features, this solution, in general, will provide all you need and it's very convenient to use. We can share our details to collaborative platforms. We can give access to users. It's pretty flexible."
"The product does not have a dictionary."
"Community support is basically what I'm looking for. Other than that, it is okay for now."
"If they could build some scripts or some configuration to get it up and running in a Docker environment, that would be good. I didn't find anything when on Docker, however, maybe they have something and I didn't see it yet."
"Especially when you use the open-source version, there are issues with performance."
"They could provide more documentation regarding the integration of different programming languages."
"It would be better if the tool were made less reliant on Java."
"The solution's pricing and scalability could be improved."
"When trying to design rule tables the solutions graphical user interface could improve, it could be more user friendly."
"OpenText 360 is generally stable, though there are sometimes issues with document size or format."
"We have a very good time to market tool, and the development platform should be made user-friendly. Mostly, it's just support."
"I would like for there to be even more integrations in the next release and I believe that the price could go down a bit."
"The user interface could definitely be improved."
"The platform's workflows could be more intuitive and easier to use."
"Its licensing needs to be simplified. Currently, its licensing is very complex. It contains a number of pieces, and you have to be an expert in reading all the conditions in the license. They should simplify the licensing and make it easier to understand. It would make a customer's life easier."
"The graphical user interface had to be more user-friendly. It's not as intuitive."
"They need to come with more out of the box solutions, rather than depending on customers to develop them."
Camunda is ranked 1st in Business Process Management (BPM) with 71 reviews while OpenText 360 for SharePoint is ranked 15th in Business Process Management (BPM) with 13 reviews. Camunda is rated 8.2, while OpenText 360 for SharePoint is rated 8.4. The top reviewer of Camunda writes "Open-source, easy to define new processes, and easy to transition to new business process definitions". On the other hand, the top reviewer of OpenText 360 for SharePoint writes "A great, collaborative environment with scalability for many products". Camunda is most compared with Apache Airflow, Bizagi, Pega BPM, IBM BPM and Appian, whereas OpenText 360 for SharePoint is most compared with Apache Airflow, Bizagi, Adobe Experience Manager (AEM) Forms, IBM BPM and IBM Business Automation Workflow. See our Camunda vs. OpenText 360 for SharePoint report.
See our list of best Business Process Management (BPM) vendors.
We monitor all Business Process Management (BPM) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
