Cisco Meraki Wireless LAN vs Mist AI and Cloud comparison

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Juniper Logo
5,118 views|3,582 comparisons
100% willing to recommend
Cisco Logo
26,733 views|20,613 comparisons
92% willing to recommend
Juniper Logo
8,490 views|6,020 comparisons
76% willing to recommend
Comparison Buyer's Guide
Executive Summary
Updated on Mar 6, 2024

We compared Cisco Meraki Wireless LAN and Mist AI and Cloud based on our user's reviews in several parameters.

In summary, Cisco Meraki Wireless LAN is praised for its stability, performance, and visibility, with exceptional customer service and reasonable pricing. Mist AI and Cloud stand out for their intuitive interface, AI-driven analytics, and proactive troubleshooting, with positive ROI and responsive customer support. Areas of improvement for both include network stability, reliability, and user interface enhancements.

Features: Cisco Meraki Wireless LAN offers stability, good performance, complete visibility, easy setup, user-friendly interface, cloud management, and device control. Mist AI and Cloud prioritize intuitive UI, easy setup, seamless integration, AI-driven analytics, proactive troubleshooting for faster problem resolution, and improved network performance.

Pricing and ROI: The setup cost for Cisco Meraki Wireless LAN is reported to be minimal and straightforward, while Mist AI and Cloud also offer a manageable setup cost. Both products have straightforward licensing processes, contributing to a positive user experience., The ROI for Cisco Meraki Wireless LAN has been positive, with improved network performance and enhanced security. Mist AI and Cloud have also provided significant returns on investment, with increased efficiency and cost savings. Both solutions offer valuable features and capabilities.

Room for Improvement: Cisco Meraki Wireless LAN has room for improvement in signal strength, network stability, user interface, compatibility, firmware updates, and customer support. Mist AI and Cloud need enhancements in performance, reliability, system delays, disruptions, interface intuitiveness, and user-friendliness.

Deployment and customer support: The reviews for Cisco Meraki Wireless LAN indicate that the duration for establishing a new tech solution can vary, with some users taking three months for deployment and an additional week for setup. In contrast, the reviews for Mist AI and Cloud also mention three months for deployment and a week for setup, but suggest that these timeframes should be considered separately in some cases., The customer service of Cisco Meraki Wireless LAN is known for its exceptional support, promptness, and effectiveness. Customers appreciate the knowledgeable staff and their helpful guidance in resolving issues efficiently. On the other hand, Mist AI and Cloud have received positive feedback for their availability, responsiveness, prompt guidance, and expert assistance, contributing to a positive user experience.

The summary above is based on 61 interviews we conducted recently with Cisco Meraki Wireless LAN and Mist AI and Cloud users. To access the review's full transcripts, download our report.

To learn more, read our detailed Cisco Meraki Wireless LAN vs. Mist AI and Cloud Report (Updated: March 2024).
771,157 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Q&A Highlights
Question: Which product would you choose and why: Mist AI and Cloud or Cisco Meraki Wireless LAN?
Answer: Had so many problems with Meraki in the past 5 years. I wouldn't recommend them to anybody. The last problem was intermittent problems connecting to an SSID, the helpdesk answer was: "make the password less complex". It was passw0rd. Roaming always seems to break whenever they do an update. One time it took more than a year to fix the issues, couldn't upgrade the firmware for more than a year. Every time I reported a problem, they wanted to upgrade our firmware, but they hadn't fixed the roaming problem. Wifi works so much better now when we moved away from Meraki. Plus, we don't have to pay the license fee anymore.
Featured Review
Quotes From Members
We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use.
Here are some excerpts of what they said:
Pros
"In terms of reporting, in terms of all the user reports, it's very rich.""Juniper Mist offers valuable features like comprehensive network insight, granular policy control, fast device setup, strong security, and efficient SSL traffic management.""It provides private network access, helping us protect our company’s devices.""The solution is stable.""The most useful feature of Juniper Wireless AP is the reporting Marvis.""The solution is pretty generic and easy to use.""The simplicity is great.""Overall, we've been very pleased with the performance."

More Juniper Mist Wireless Access Points Pros →

"It enables quick deployment within all branches for the users.""The product's cloud controller is easy to use.""The automatic VMware update is very useful because you don't have to worry about outages and planning for VMware updates. It is very advantageous from a management point of view. The ability to restrict and review the clients connected to each of our segments. Additionally, the solution is easy to use.""This product has allowed us to easily create custom SSIDs for clients and carve out the necessary bandwidth for clients needs.""Cisco's technical support is very good and better than other vendors.""It is cloud-based. You can manage it remotely from anywhere in the world, and you don't have to be on-site, which is a very big advantage.""I really love their cloud-based dashboard which allows me to see all my locations from one location.""The emailing of statuses is the most valuable feature."

More Cisco Meraki Wireless LAN Pros →

"Regarding features, the solution seems to be very intuitive.""The tool's best part is the GUI. It is user-friendly and fast due to AI features. The solution can help you fix things with AI, which is impressive.""The cost is the most valuable aspect of this solution.""There are several valuable features. One of them is Cibas, and another one is Marvis.""AI-driven automation helps implement the solution quickly.""It's really easy to provision and support. Those are its main features.""The AI deployment process involves adding access points and placing them in the designated area. The AI system automatically adjusts channel selection and transmission power without any issues with stability or throughput. It has improved network performance.""The most useful aspect of Mist AI and Cloud is automation capabilities."

More Mist AI and Cloud Pros →

Cons
"If you want to do more specific stuff, it's a bit limited.""Juniper Wireless AP can improve by continually improving its reporting and integration with other systems.""It would be helpful to have even stronger security features to help protect against interference from other nearby access points that aren't part of our network.""Enrolling into the tool is a tedious process.""The price could be better.""The solution is expensive.""The product should include adaptive Wi-Fi to show a more accurate location.""Juniper Wireless Access Points (AP Series) could improve if the MIST platform had a built-in master key. This would be an advantage."

More Juniper Mist Wireless Access Points Cons →

"When we are using SSID roaming, it is not flexible in terms of which AP it connects to.""Integration with the corporate LAN where Catalyst products are installed is a major challenge.""The solution's pricing could be improved.""We're are not fully utilizing the features of Cisco Meraki Wireless LAN to know a more in-depth analysis of what areas need to be improved. However, the security could improve. It would be a benefit to be able to lock out particular clients that are trying to connect from outside the building.""I would like to see them improve their support where an assigned engineer can take the case all the way to closure. Usually, you get a different engineer calling regarding the same ticket.""In the next release, I would like to see a third-party high tech center to connect multiple users to a particular network.""The price could be slightly better, but then again, we negotiate deals every time so the market price isn't really relevant.""Documentation could be improved, but everything else has been spot-on."

More Cisco Meraki Wireless LAN Cons →

"The solution lacks documentation.""The user experience should be improved. It's not user-friendly.""There are some technical issues that may require attention""It would be beneficial to have support for the Chinese language.""The solution doesn't provide mail notifications currently.""The solution has various licensing policies. It will be easy to use if it is an open single license.""Currently, the solution lacks the ability to configure with other solutions from other vendors.""Sometimes it takes a lot of time for the access point to connect with the cloud."

More Mist AI and Cloud Cons →

Pricing and Cost Advice
  • "We pay maybe 1000 SEK per year, per access point."
  • "Juniper Wireless AP's price is a little more expensive than other solutions, but you get what you pay for."
  • "The pricing is something Juniper Wireless Access Points (AP Series) can work on. The pricing is very high compared to the competition."
  • "The pricing is too high."
  • "The solution is expensive."
  • "I rate Juniper Mist's pricing a ten out of ten since it is expensive."
  • "I rate the pricing an eight out of ten."
  • "The pricing is fair."
  • More Juniper Mist Wireless Access Points Pricing and Cost Advice →

  • "Negotiate the deal put in front of you!"
  • "At this price point, I would not mind seeing a four-way channel, instead of a 3x3 or a 4x4, like they do in the Cisco Aironet system with their other brand. For the same price point in this other Cisco brand, it is a lot cheaper, and you can get a slightly better throughput than you can with these."
  • "​If you are wondering if Meraki can work for you, contact one of their representatives because they will do onsite trials where you can set up their system. If it does not work, you can send it back to them for no charge.​​"
  • "The price is negotiable."
  • "It's a pretty good value, but not great. Pricing is on a yearly basis for the Meraki solution."
  • "The price is good, but it could be improved."
  • "You have to renew your contract every year, or for three or for five years. If you do not pay right away they will suspend your subscription."
  • "The pricing is based on a subscription and is a bit high at the moment."
  • More Cisco Meraki Wireless LAN Pricing and Cost Advice →

  • "The price of this product is approximately the same as competing products in the market."
  • "The price is about the same compared to other vendors. There is an add-on license, but it's up to you if you want to buy it or not."
  • "The price of Mist AI and Cloud is approximately 20 percent less than competitors, such as Aruba and Cisco. However, Cisco has a lifetime warranty for its solutions."
  • "The solution's price is too high for the end-users. My customers pay 1,000 USD towards the licensing cost of the solution every year."
  • "Depending on the features, I think it's quite reasonably priced, especially considering the facilities of the product."
  • "I rate the pricing a seven on a scale of one to ten, where one is low and ten is high."
  • "The custom licensing is a little bit expensive and I would rate it 7.5 out of 10."
  • "The price is not cheap, but it's a reliable solution and very easy for management."
  • More Mist AI and Cloud Pricing and Cost Advice →

    report
    Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Wireless LAN solutions are best for your needs.
    771,157 professionals have used our research since 2012.
    Questions from the Community
    Top Answer:The most valuable feature of Juniper Mist is the Virtual Network Assistant, powered by artificial intelligence.
    Top Answer:Juniper Mist is very reasonable in terms of pricing, especially when compared to competitors like Cisco.
    Top Answer:Improving third-party integration is key for Juniper Mist's next release. Better control over devices from vendors like… more »
    Top Answer:Depends.  I have personally used both Cisco and Aruba so I am familiar with them.  Extreme I am not, so unless they have… more »
    Top Answer:Cisco Wireless is very robust, very rugged, and can handle indoor and outdoor coverage extremely well. We found it to be… more »
    Top Answer:Cisco’s Meraki Virtual MX is a virtual instance of the Meraki SD-WAN appliance. We liked the Meraki. The Wifi APs are a… more »
    Top Answer:The AI deployment process involves adding access points and placing them in the designated area. The AI system… more »
    Top Answer:Mist AI and Cloud need to improve the configuration speed.
    Comparisons
    Also Known As
    Juniper Wireless Access Points (AP Series), Mist Access Points
    MR18, MR26, MR32, MR34, MR66, MR72, Meraki Wireless LAN, Meraki WLAN
    Mist Access Points
    Learn More
    Cisco
    Video Not Available
    Overview

    Juniper Wireless Access Points work in conjunction with Juniper Mist Cloud Services and Mist AI to deliver premier wireless access capabilities. The Juniper Mist Edge extends microservices to the campus to bring agility and scale while enabling new applications at the edge.

    Cisco Meraki access points are built from the highest grade components and carefully optimized for a seamless user experience. The outcome: faster connections, greater user capacity, more coverage, and fewer support calls. The Cisco Meraki dashboard gives visibility into the network users, their devices, and their applications. Armed with rich analytics, administrators can quickly create access control and application usage policies, optimizing both the end-user experience and network security.

    Mist AI uses a combination of artificial intelligence, machine learning, and data science techniques to optimize user experiences and simplify operations across the wireless access, wired access, and SD-WAN domains.

    Data is ingested from numerous sources, including Juniper Mist Access Points, Switches, Session Smart Routers, and Firewalls for end-to-end insight into user experiences. These devices work in concert with Mist AI to optimize user experiences from client-to-cloud, including automated event correlation, root cause identification, Self-Driving Network™ operations, network assurance, proactive anomaly detection, and more.

    Juniper also leverages Mist AI for next-generation customer support. It is the foundational element behind Marvis, the industry’s first AI-driven Virtual Network Assistant, which provides extensive insight and guidance to IT staff via a natural language conversational interface.

    With Mist AI, operators save time and money with faster problem resolution and fewer onsite visits. Users benefit from a network infrastructure that is more predictable, reliable, and measurable.

    Sample Customers
    Information Not Available
    Advanced Medical Transport, Banco de Guayaquil, Baylor Scott & White Health, BH Telecom, Bowling Green State University, Calligaris, Children's Hospital Colorado, City of Biel, Del Papa Distributing, Department of Justice, Dimension Data, Dualtec Cloud Builders, Electricity Authority of Cyprus, Grupo Industrial Saltillo (GIS), Hertz, K&L Gates , LightEdge, Lone Star College System, Management Science Associates, Mindtree, NBC Olympics, Quest, Sony Corporation, The Department of Education in Western Australia, Valley Proteins
    Dartmouth, Hitachi, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, Nebraska Furniture Mart, NTT, Okta
    Top Industries
    REVIEWERS
    Educational Organization25%
    Computer Software Company25%
    Newspaper13%
    Healthcare Company13%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Computer Software Company18%
    Manufacturing Company7%
    Government7%
    Educational Organization6%
    REVIEWERS
    Comms Service Provider19%
    Educational Organization10%
    Non Profit8%
    Financial Services Firm8%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Computer Software Company20%
    Comms Service Provider7%
    Manufacturing Company6%
    Government6%
    REVIEWERS
    Computer Software Company21%
    Real Estate/Law Firm14%
    Government14%
    Educational Organization14%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Educational Organization24%
    Computer Software Company19%
    Retailer6%
    Manufacturing Company6%
    Company Size
    REVIEWERS
    Small Business38%
    Midsize Enterprise19%
    Large Enterprise44%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Small Business30%
    Midsize Enterprise17%
    Large Enterprise53%
    REVIEWERS
    Small Business54%
    Midsize Enterprise21%
    Large Enterprise25%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Small Business29%
    Midsize Enterprise17%
    Large Enterprise54%
    REVIEWERS
    Small Business38%
    Midsize Enterprise29%
    Large Enterprise33%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Small Business20%
    Midsize Enterprise28%
    Large Enterprise52%
    Buyer's Guide
    Cisco Meraki Wireless LAN vs. Mist AI and Cloud
    March 2024
    Find out what your peers are saying about Cisco Meraki Wireless LAN vs. Mist AI and Cloud and other solutions. Updated: March 2024.
    771,157 professionals have used our research since 2012.

    Cisco Meraki Wireless LAN is ranked 4th in Wireless LAN with 115 reviews while Mist AI and Cloud is ranked 7th in Wireless LAN with 21 reviews. Cisco Meraki Wireless LAN is rated 8.2, while Mist AI and Cloud is rated 7.6. The top reviewer of Cisco Meraki Wireless LAN writes "Offers good mobility, stability and scalability ". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Mist AI and Cloud writes "A combination of artificial intelligence, machine learning, and data science techniques to optimize user experiences". Cisco Meraki Wireless LAN is most compared with Aruba Wireless, Ruckus Wireless, Ubiquiti Wireless, Cisco Wireless and Huawei Wireless, whereas Mist AI and Cloud is most compared with Aruba Wireless, Cisco Wireless, ExtremeCloud IQ, Ruckus Wireless and Meraki Dashboard. See our Cisco Meraki Wireless LAN vs. Mist AI and Cloud report.

    See our list of best Wireless LAN vendors.

    We monitor all Wireless LAN reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.