We performed a comparison between Cisco Meraki Wireless LAN and Mojo Networks based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Wireless LAN solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."The solution is stable."
"The solution is very secure."
"With Mist, every Wednesday they roll out new features."
"The solution is pretty generic and easy to use."
"It provides private network access, helping us protect our company’s devices."
"The AI capabilities of Mist Wireless are superior to other OEMs."
"The most valuable feature of the solution is Marvis, the AI-driven network management system."
"The most valuable feature of Juniper Mist is the Virtual Network Assistant, powered by artificial intelligence."
"Cisco Meraki is HIPAA compliant."
"Provided reliability and a good price."
"The initial setup of Cisco Meraki Wireless LAN was very easy."
"Cloud managed wireless LAN product that's stable and scalable. It's an easy to deploy and easy to troubleshoot solution."
"The product's cloud controller is easy to use."
"Its flexibility, ease of management via the portal, and the variety of access points are the most valuable features."
"The functionalities are quite professional and complete. It offers good integration with other Meraki products, like switches and the firewall. You can get an overview of all networks and the host. It's really great; nobody else can do that."
"The management console is valuable."
"Mojo Networks (Arista WiFi) is extremely secure with WIPS, built-in wireless."
"The most important feature is ease of use. We can simply take an access point and plug it in, then it is automatically configured for us."
"The features that I like the most are the visibility and the firewall, which is very good."
"For support, we do not have to deal with a whole phone menu tree. You get to talk to an engineer right away."
"Security is top-notch with WIPS (Wireless Intrusion Prevention System)."
"The most valuable feature is the seamless connection between the end-user on the wireless side."
"Built-in guest analytics and advanced guest portal features allow our customers to create a guest experience which is typically only available with complex and expensive third-party software."
"Initial setup was straightforward."
"The pricing is very high in the Indian market."
"The solution is expensive."
"The product should include adaptive Wi-Fi to show a more accurate location."
"If you want to do more specific stuff, it's a bit limited."
"Juniper Wireless Access Points (AP Series) could improve if the MIST platform had a built-in master key. This would be an advantage."
"The pricing should be made cheaper."
"Improving third-party integration is key for Juniper Mist's next release."
"It would be helpful to have even stronger security features to help protect against interference from other nearby access points that aren't part of our network."
"It would be better if they enable full integration with Cisco's cloud-based network in the next release."
"They should introduce a grace period of 60 days after license expiry because as it is now, it automatically goes down and there is no grace period."
"The product's coverage area could be expanded. It would help ensure better connectivity."
"Cisco Meraki Wireless LAN could improve by having more granularity in terms of the data displayed. However, I understand that with Cisco Meraki Wireless LAN, you need to have a compromise point to what are the functions that you're going to provide to the users versus ease of use. More granularity in terms of the data and the things that you can do to the devices would be helpful. For example, when we wanted to make a change, restriction, or segregation within Palo Alto, we can go to the level of detail that we want. The amount of detail provided is amazing, it is very granular. However, it comes with much more difficulty, it requires a technical understanding of the environment compared to Cisco Meraki Wireless LAN."
"Our only concern at this stage is how it's licensed."
"It is super expensive for what you get. I just wish it was less expensive."
"When we are using SSID roaming, it is not flexible in terms of which AP it connects to."
"The price could be slightly lowered to make it more competitive in the market."
"The customer service and support took a lot of time to come on the troubleshooting call."
"The user interface could use improvement, and Mojo is working on it. The features and functions are in two different places, and they are in the process of moving them into one place."
"The distribution can be improved, particularly in this part of the world."
"Something that could be improved is the ability to easily and quickly see what speed someone is on and if there are any issues on the network. We are using the older software technology, so maybe their newest version is able to do that."
"Needs greater simplicity in the management portal. Currently, the Mojo portal presents different “apps” to configure the devices, create splash pages, configure security settings, and monitor the network. This can be confusing, although Mojo has made great strides in combining these into “Aware”."
"The RF signalling and data analytics parts should be improved."
"The implementation could be simplified. Right now it's a bit complex."
"The solution is a bit pricier than Cisco."
More Juniper Mist Wireless Access Points Pricing and Cost Advice →
Cisco Meraki Wireless LAN is ranked 4th in Wireless LAN with 115 reviews while Mojo Networks is ranked 20th in Wireless LAN with 16 reviews. Cisco Meraki Wireless LAN is rated 8.2, while Mojo Networks is rated 8.2. The top reviewer of Cisco Meraki Wireless LAN writes "Offers good mobility, stability and scalability ". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Mojo Networks writes "The product is easy to deploy since it can be done seamlessly with zero testing ". Cisco Meraki Wireless LAN is most compared with Aruba Wireless, Ruckus Wireless, Ubiquiti Wireless, Mist AI and Cloud and Cisco Wireless, whereas Mojo Networks is most compared with Mist AI and Cloud, Aruba Wireless and Cisco Wireless. See our Cisco Meraki Wireless LAN vs. Mojo Networks report.
See our list of best Wireless LAN vendors.
We monitor all Wireless LAN reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
