We performed a comparison between ESET Endpoint Protection Platform and Trellix Endpoint Security (ENS) based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Endpoint Protection Platform (EPP) solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."NGAV and EDR features are outstanding."
"Impressive detection capabilities"
"I get alerts when scripts are detected in the environment."
"It is stable and scalable."
"The main thing is that I feel safe. Because the processes that have been used to get a handle on the attackers are much better than other competitors"
"It is a scalable solution...The initial setup of Fortinet FortiEDR was straightforward."
"The product's initial setup phase is very easy."
"The console is easy to read. I also like the scanning part and the ability to move assets from one to the other."
"The most valuable feature of this solution is the ease of use."
"Advanced level endpoint firewall, which helps to block unwanted and malicious traffic."
"The ability to push policies and also to restrict an installation or to restrict any form of threat within the policy has been quite useful."
"It's a very user-friendly product."
"The product does not slow down the machine."
"The tool protects everything."
"The solution's features and pricing are pretty good."
"The features seem to be alright."
"It is scalable and stable and the initial setup is the easiest part of using the product."
"The setup is not that complex. It takes five to ten minutes to set up."
"The most valuable features of McAfee MVISION Endpoint are advanced threat protection, web filtering, and removable storage devices in the DLP."
"The technical support services are good."
"The threat scanning is excellent. It uses predictive technology and I can utilize attack data to help us fine-tune our systems and network infrastructure. This protects us against current and future attacks."
"The most valuable feature is user-based policy provision."
"Technical support is excellent."
"MVISION Endpoint is so much easier and so much simpler for the lay security personnel to handle."
"The amount of usage, the number of details we get, or the number of options that can be tweaked is limited in comparison to that with other EDR solutions"
"The SIEM could be improved."
"The solution should address emerging threats like SQL injection."
"We find the solution to be a bit expensive."
"The dashboard isn't easy to access and manage."
"Integration with Azure and SaaS provisioning tools could improve Fortinet FortiEDR."
"Intelligence aspects need improvement"
"ZTNA can improve latency."
"The solution could be more user-friendly."
"I would like them to use AI features to do preventative virus protection."
"It can be hard to set up if you need to customize it."
"The stability needs to be improved. There are bugs that you have to deal with."
"The scalability could be better."
"After we did the initial setup of ESET Endpoint Security, we had to inform users about popups. This solution comes with an in-built software firewall and there can be some popups coming. We must tell the user not to keep, allow, or block anything. That is the main issue on the user side we have faced. The user's experience may not be as good."
"The integration capabilities might be lacking a bit."
"We'd like the solution to be a next generation antivirus with some sort of artificial intelligence or machine learning angle."
"The technical support needs some improvement. When product distribution errors occur, we have to contact technical support, which is a very tedious task."
"Search feature could be made more user-friendly."
"A policy-editing console should be added."
"The customization capabilities of the solution are an area where it lacks, so it would be great if our company could customize the solution to meet the demands of our customers."
"The solution lacks device control."
"Malware detection can be better. It doesn't have support and detection for the recent malware, but it has a compensatory control where it can do the behavior-based assessment and alert you when there is something malicious or unexpected. For example, when a certain user is executing the privilege command, which is not normal. These dynamic detections are good, and they compensate for malware detection."
"The integration and display of the dashboards have to be done better."
"I hope the solution can be used in cloud systems going forward."
More ESET Endpoint Protection Platform Pricing and Cost Advice →
More Trellix Endpoint Security (ENS) Pricing and Cost Advice →
ESET Endpoint Protection Platform is ranked 9th in Endpoint Protection Platform (EPP) with 99 reviews while Trellix Endpoint Security (ENS) is ranked 19th in Endpoint Protection Platform (EPP) with 49 reviews. ESET Endpoint Protection Platform is rated 8.2, while Trellix Endpoint Security (ENS) is rated 7.6. The top reviewer of ESET Endpoint Protection Platform writes "Easy to set up with good security and rapidly improving capabilities". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Trellix Endpoint Security (ENS) writes "Reliable with good independent modules and a straightforward setup". ESET Endpoint Protection Platform is most compared with Microsoft Defender for Endpoint, Kaspersky Endpoint Security for Business, CrowdStrike Falcon, SentinelOne Singularity Complete and Check Point Harmony Endpoint, whereas Trellix Endpoint Security (ENS) is most compared with Trellix Endpoint Security, Microsoft Defender for Endpoint, CrowdStrike Falcon, Trellix Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR) and Open EDR. See our ESET Endpoint Protection Platform vs. Trellix Endpoint Security (ENS) report.
See our list of best Endpoint Protection Platform (EPP) vendors.
We monitor all Endpoint Protection Platform (EPP) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.