We performed a comparison between Fortinet FortiAuthenticator and One Identity Manager based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Identity Management (IM) solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."When we started with identity and access management, we cleaned up and skipped 500 accounts. Therefore, there are a lot of people who are still in our system. Using this tool, we have cleaned up a lot of accounts for ourselves as well as our partners and suppliers. So, we can manage everything now."
"Omada's best feature is creating accounts, automatically assigning permissions, and distributing resources based on assignment policies."
"The administrative features and SoD are valuable."
"It has a very user-friendly interface compared to what we are used to, and it is highly configurable. In the old solution, when we needed to do something, we had to have a programmer sitting next to us, whereas, in Omada Identity, everything is configurable."
"User-friendly solution."
"Support-wise, working with Omada has been good. We have very good direct interactions and fast responses."
"The benefits of Omada Identity include a holistic way of viewing access, the ability to give people access, and automation."
"As an administrator, we benefit from a lot of functionality that is available out of the box, but it is also configurable to meet our specific needs."
"Simple to deploy, simple to use, and user-friendly."
"The product's on-premise version doesn't have recurring costs."
"It reduces the need for network administrator intervention by allowing the user to perform their own registration and resolve their own password problems and issues."
"For someone concerned with multifactor authentication, I'm satisfied with the product."
"It integrates very tightly with the rest of the Fortinet ecosystem."
"The implementation has significantly improved access management within our organization."
"I prefer the passing tool that sent an active directory console to a Fortinet FortiAuthenticator, then Fortinet FortiAuthenticator does not pass the locks."
"Fortinet FortiAuthenticator is an easy-to-use solution."
"It's very flexible. You can customize it to the fullest extent. You can use it for almost every situation for every customer."
"The solution does help us efficiently manage lots of authorizations automatically."
"One Identity is simple to implement. About 90 percent of the implementation is configuration rather than scripting and creating the connectors."
"The biggest improvement has been the auditing. Now we have a record of what the users have, what the users have requested and when, and when things were approved. It's all in the same system."
"One Identity Manager offers several features that I found advantageous compared to other tools."
"The self-service functionality of One Identity Manager is arguably the most valuable feature."
"This is almost a complete solution for us."
"Its flexibility is the most valuable feature, the way we can customize the user interface and the workflow processes."
"Omada could communicate better with us about the product roadmap. We haven't gotten any updates about it. The user interface is often a bit difficult to understand. It isn't optimized for small screens, so it doesn't display all of the information clearly, so users need to scroll a lot."
"In our organization, all the data is event-driven, which means that if an attribute is changed in the source system, it can be updated within a few seconds in all end-user systems. There is room for improvement in Omada regarding that. Omada is still batch-based for some processes, so sometimes it can take an hour or even four hours before the execution is run and the update is sent."
"The web GUI can be improved."
"The solution should be made more agile for customers to own or configure."
"The UI design needs improvement. One or two years ago, Omada changed its user interface to simplify, but the simplification has not really kicked in."
"I would like to see them expand the functionality of the tool to continue to be competitive with the monsters out there. For example, they could add functionality on the authentication side, functionality that Octa and SailPoint have. But they should do that while maintaining the same simplicity that makes Omada a product of choice today."
"Its flexibility is both a good thing and a bad thing. Because it is very flexible, it also becomes too complex. This is common for most of the products we evaluated. Its scalability should be better. It had a few scalability issues."
"There is room for improvement in Omada's integration capabilities, particularly in streamlining complex integrations and enhancing programming logic for better rule management."
"The GUI is on the older side but I'm sure that it will be upgraded soon. It works, but it looks a little dated."
"The speed of deployment on the cloud could be improved. It took a few days when it should have been just two days"
"The product must provide 2FA for applications."
"We had issues trying to integrate the keys properly during the initial setup."
"There is room for improvement in stability and support."
"I would like to see integration and customization capabilities with the end-user portal to solve authentication issues with diverse implementation scenarios."
"The hardware aspect of the solution could be improved. We are not really able to understand the hardware capabilities of the device."
"I would like to see more support from Fortinet with tech support people who have as much expertise on the authenticator as they do on their firewalls."
"The initial setup was complex."
"The solution should come up with a lighter version so people can buy different versions."
"I would like to integrate automated testing with One Identity, and it would be great to have some support from the vendor on here."
"The product is quite scalable, except for the database which is not highly available. This is where scalability could be improved."
"The product's GUI could be more user-friendly."
"A tool called Analyzer is included to assist with birthright generation. The tool isn't very user-friendly."
"Some features aren't supported by the technical support. It is based on your own risk, which I can accept, but I would be happier if they would provide me some additional information about them anyway, e.g., deleting tables or columns."
"I would like to have more advanced features and reporting added to One Identity Manager."
Fortinet FortiAuthenticator is ranked 7th in Identity Management (IM) with 52 reviews while One Identity Manager is ranked 3rd in Identity Management (IM) with 77 reviews. Fortinet FortiAuthenticator is rated 8.0, while One Identity Manager is rated 8.0. The top reviewer of Fortinet FortiAuthenticator writes "A reasonably priced solution that can be scaled toward different functionalities and offers flexible SMS messaging". On the other hand, the top reviewer of One Identity Manager writes "The JML is customizable but the support team isn't strong". Fortinet FortiAuthenticator is most compared with Cisco ISE (Identity Services Engine), Fortinet FortiNAC, Fortinet FortiToken, Cisco Duo and Microsoft Entra ID, whereas One Identity Manager is most compared with SailPoint Identity Security Cloud, Oracle Identity Governance, EVOLVEUM midPoint, Cisco ISE (Identity Services Engine) and Saviynt. See our Fortinet FortiAuthenticator vs. One Identity Manager report.
See our list of best Identity Management (IM) vendors.
We monitor all Identity Management (IM) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
