We performed a comparison between G-Core Labs CDN and Imperva DDoS based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two CDN solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."Uptime is always perfect."
"Since transitioning to G-Core, our site has started working much faster, and freezes have stopped. Users are staying on the site longer and visiting more sections. We increased the number of customers by 30 percent in the past six months. This is partially attributable to G-Core services."
"The CDN interface is intuitive and user-friendly, and there are no intrusive ads or upselling additional services. Everything is self-contained, and it's a convenient CDN overall. We also loved that they provided a free trial period. They always seem to do what's best for the consumer and the internet."
"The support is amazing! They solve the issues on the fly."
"The solution is very good at intercepting traffic before it gets to our data centers."
"Its unique interface for managing security performance and ease of use are the most valuable features of this solution."
"It blocks all types of attacks."
"They're quite easy to install and quite easy to set up. Clients really like that. Especially when you're dealing with the cloud, it's really easy."
"The technical support is excellent."
"Imperva DDoS is fairly stable, and its availability is quite high."
"Technical support provides good, quick responses."
"The most valuable features are DDoS protection."
"It would be great if there were a section on the provider's website that shows a set of services for a particular business. It would be helpful to have some kind of checklist of services that are suitable for your blog, which are required, and which can be set up later."
"Once in the past six months, we got a "site is unavailable" error for a maximum of 20 minutes."
"I would like to have one optimized report that we could use for our own needs."
"There are some nuances in the tariff configurations that we found confusing. We would like more flexibility in this area."
"We had an issue when securing the web applications for DDoS protection."
"It would be beneficial to include vulnerability management in the solution, similar to what they have for their on-premise solution."
"Imperva should have more points of presence in Africa."
"It's quite expensive."
"The solution needs to improve Integration with third parties for their on-prem deployment models. The integration is not that good yet."
"The product could use a broader scope in the area of policies."
"I miss being able to integrate the dashboard with other BI tools we are using. We have to export and import data to be able to present it, and doing so is a lot of work."
"I would like to have support for SSL management and secure DNS."
G-Core Labs CDN is ranked 9th in CDN with 4 reviews while Imperva DDoS is ranked 5th in CDN with 74 reviews. G-Core Labs CDN is rated 9.2, while Imperva DDoS is rated 8.8. The top reviewer of G-Core Labs CDN writes "Works without interruption, scales well, and has perfect uptime". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Imperva DDoS writes "I like the content monitoring feature which I haven't seen in other WAF solutions". G-Core Labs CDN is most compared with Cloudflare, Cloudflare DNS and Amazon CloudFront, whereas Imperva DDoS is most compared with Cloudflare, Akamai, Arbor DDoS, Radware DefensePro and AWS WAF. See our G-Core Labs CDN vs. Imperva DDoS report.
See our list of best CDN vendors.
We monitor all CDN reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.