We performed a comparison between GitHub and Snyk based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Application Security Tools solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."I'm able to access any repository that I like, whether it's public or private."
"The most valuable aspects of GitHub are version control and parallel development. I also appreciate the forking part, which allows us to release a specific set of features to the environment."
"We can make a private repository."
"The most valuable feature is the source code management. It's very helpful and it's a great product."
"I use this solution to store my code in a repository so we can manage version control which is useful."
"Has great integration with third-party tools."
"The most valuable feature is help offered by the community for open-source projects."
"The most valuable feature of GitHub is version control and continuous integration."
"Snyk is a good and scalable tool."
"The dependency checks of the libraries are very valuable, but the licensing part is also very important because, with open source components, licensing can be all over the place. Our project is not an open source project, but we do use quite a lot of open source components and we want to make sure that we don't have surprises in there."
"The advantage of Snyk is that Snyk automatically creates a pull request for all the findings that match or are classified according to the policy that we create. So, once we review the PR within Snyk and we approve the PR, Snyk auto-fixes the issue, which is quite interesting and which isn't there in any other product out there. So, Snyk is a step ahead in this particular area."
"Snyk has given us really good results because it is fully automated. We don't have to scan projects every time to find vulnerabilities, as it already stores the dependencies that we are using. It monitors 24/7 to find out if there are any issues that have been reported out on the Internet."
"We use Snyk to check vulnerabilities and rectify potential leaks in GitHub."
"I am impressed with the product's security vulnerability detection. My peers in security are praising the tool for its accuracy to detect security vulnerabilities. The product is very easy to onboard. It doesn't require a lot of preparation or prerequisites. It's a bit of a plug-and-play as long as you're using a package manager or for example, you are using a GitHub repository. And that is an advantage for this tool because developers don't want to add more tools to what they're currently using."
"The solution has great features and is quite stable."
"The most valuable feature of Snyk is the SBOM."
"There is a bit of a learning curve."
"I would like a more graphical, user-friendly UI, to avoid writing so much code on cmd."
"They're improving the work items to track the progress of the team, but in my experience, Azure DevOps is better in this functionality. GitHub needs to improve the form to track the progress of the work done by a team."
"It is difficult to merge a code or restore it to an older version."
"The project management sector really needs some improvement for GitHub. I don't know if GitHub made sense for me as a project manager."
"GitHub needs to improve its UI."
"GitHub could expand the limits of the free version."
"The solution can improve by adding video guides, official guides, or short courses that cater to beginners who are new to the system. These resources could offer step-by-step guidance on how to use GitHub, including common procedures such as pulling and committing. Currently, many of us have to resort to searching for information on how to do these tasks via Google. An official guide provided by GitHub itself would be a valuable asset to newcomers and would save them time and effort."
"A feature we would like to see is the ability to archive and store historical data, without actually deleting it. It's a problem because it throws my numbers off. When I'm looking at the dashboard's current vulnerabilities, it's not accurate."
"Snyk's API and UI features could work better in terms of speed."
"The feature for automatic fixing of security breaches could be improved."
"We would like to have upfront knowledge on how easy it should be to just pull in an upgraded dependency, e.g., even introduce full automation for dependencies supposed to have no impact on the business side of things. Therefore, we would like some output when you get the report with the dependencies. We want to get additional information on the expected impact of the business code that is using the dependency with the newer version. This probably won't be easy to add, but it would be helpful."
"It can be improved from the reporting perspective and scanning perspective. They can also improve it on the UI front."
"For the areas that they're new in, it's very early stages for them. For example, their expertise is in looking at third-party components and packages, which is their bread-and-butter and what they've been doing for ages, but for newer features such as static analysis I don't think they've got compatibility for all the languages and frameworks yet."
"The log export function could be easier when shipping logs to other platforms such as Splunk."
"They need to improve the Snyk plugins and make it easier to make your optimizations based on your own needs or features."
GitHub is ranked 12th in Application Security Tools with 69 reviews while Snyk is ranked 4th in Application Security Tools with 41 reviews. GitHub is rated 8.6, while Snyk is rated 8.2. The top reviewer of GitHub writes "Beneficial version control and continuous integration, but guides would be helpful". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Snyk writes "Performs software composition analysis (SCA) similar to other expensive tools". GitHub is most compared with AWS CodeCommit, Bitbucket, Fortify on Demand, Atlassian SourceTree and Checkmarx One, whereas Snyk is most compared with SonarQube, Black Duck, GitHub Advanced Security, Fortify Static Code Analyzer and Mend.io. See our GitHub vs. Snyk report.
See our list of best Application Security Tools vendors.
We monitor all Application Security Tools reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
