We performed a comparison between AWS CodeCommit and GitHub based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Version Control solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."AWS CodeCommit is much easier to use than Bitbucket. It doesn't require any personal password or these things. We just need to put in our AWS account password and username."
"It helps us to install our code idea projects."
"AWS CodeCommit is simple and cheap."
"The most valuable feature is the fact that it's cloud-based, and we don't have to manage an on-premises server to use it."
"The most valuable features are GitHub are the standard features, they are very useful."
"The best feature is the ability to track the history of all code changes, and it's easy to use. Additionally, as it's open source, anyone can use that feature resulting in distributed development. This opens the door to collaboration with different code and developer, feature, and master branches of development."
"This solution is very easy to use which I like about it. The capacity to own artifacts and share them with others is another good feature. You don't have to write all your code from scratch, you can use available templates and alter the code according to your needs."
"If you want to share documents, you can create articles and diagrams with GitHub and share."
"The most valuable feature of the solution is the version control field."
"This product allows us to easily collaborate on development tasks with our subcontractors, and control the workflow as the project progresses."
"We use GitHub instead of our regular shared drive. It offers instant access to shared folders as well as good security."
"The solution could be more user-friendly and cheaper."
"There are some options in Bitbucket that are not available in AWS CodeCommit. For example, code reviewer. We can't add a code reviewer in AWS CodeCommit, and we can't fork the repository online. These are the two things that Bitbucket has, but the solution doesn't have. Also, Jira has a debugging option that AWS CodeCommit doesn't have. Another thing is that Bitbucket charges three dollars per month per user. Compared with AWS CodeCommit, that only charges one dollar per month. So, AWS CodeCommit is cheaper than Bitbucket. But it does not have enough features that Bitbucket has. Additionally, it will be good if you upload one video or documentation on how to use AWS CodeCommit for beginners. That will be more helpful. There you can add more details about pricing. There are not many details about pricing. Bitbucket has a table where they have mentioned everything in detail, like, what features for how much price, how much longer you can use and how many users can use."
"The tool should improve its UI."
"Could be more user friendly."
"They're improving the work items to track the progress of the team, but in my experience, Azure DevOps is better in this functionality. GitHub needs to improve the form to track the progress of the work done by a team."
"GitHub needs to improve its UI."
"This solution could be improved if migration was fully automated to make it easy, for example, to migrate repositories into GitHub."
"As of now, if I would like to learn about GitHub or its features, I would have to look on YouTube. It would be nice if they were able to send out a newsletter with explanations of new features that they are offering and what features are available."
"The initial setup and implementation could be easier, I had some difficulties with it at first but I don't have a development background."
"It would be better if the amount of storage were increased."
"There could be more integration into Azure."
AWS CodeCommit is ranked 5th in Version Control with 3 reviews while GitHub is ranked 3rd in Version Control with 74 reviews. AWS CodeCommit is rated 7.4, while GitHub is rated 8.6. The top reviewer of AWS CodeCommit writes "Offers convenient and cost-effective version control but lacks some advanced features and integration options ". On the other hand, the top reviewer of GitHub writes "Beneficial version control and continuous integration, but guides would be helpful". AWS CodeCommit is most compared with Bitbucket, Atlassian SourceTree and Bitbucket Server, whereas GitHub is most compared with Snyk, Fortify on Demand, Bitbucket, Atlassian SourceTree and Checkmarx One. See our AWS CodeCommit vs. GitHub report.
See our list of best Version Control vendors.
We monitor all Version Control reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
