We performed a comparison between Google Cloud and SAP S4HANA on AWS based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Infrastructure as a Service Clouds (IaaS) solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."Technical support has been good."
"Google Cloud is easy to use and accessible anywhere."
"The infrastructure is easy to manage."
"The solution has improved our web apps so that we can have a canary deployment. GCP also helps us upload new features and changes to our software without impacting a lot of users with the network. The AI features have improved the software as well."
"The stability is good with Google Cloud."
"The features I found most valuable are the cloud run and cloud function."
"The customer service team for this solution is very knowledgeable."
"This is a solution that's so easy to expand when you need it to. It's the best I've ever seen. It's much better than Azure."
"I would rate this solution as a nine out of ten because it covers all the fields, has a big maturity, and has something other solutions are missing, which is speed."
"There are two main features that we find very valuable. One is the interface and the new user experience. That's really, really helpful for the end-user. The second is the HANA database itself because it speeds up the process. In other solutions, like Oracle, there is a lot of redundancy that slows things down."
"The most valuable features of SAP S4HANA on AWS are that it's simplified and the analytical capabilities are good."
"Provides good performance and regular release of new features."
"The solution adds great value to any organization."
"Reporting transparency and user-friendliness are the key benefit of deploying SAP S4HANA on AWS. Furthermore, the solution offers a plethora of modules that have proven to be valuable, and there are regular updates available."
"SAP has an auto-scaling feature, but Azure doesn't."
"The most valuable feature of SAP S4HANA is Fiori. It allows users to access information quickly and easily, without having to navigate through unnecessary screens or transactions. Additionally, the ability to retrieve data more efficiently is helpful. Furthermore, the pre-delivered videos and functionalities within the solution allow for easier application building."
"The solution could improve by being less expensive."
"Google Cloud lacks some tools for database migration. I've only used MySQL and AWS in my career, so those are the only ones I can compare. AWS has a database migration tool that you can integrate with a cloud backup, so can take that backup and restore it in the AWS public cloud, but it's not the same with Google Cloud."
"They could integrate artificial intelligence into the applications."
"The documentation could be better."
"I would improve the integration with other devices such as smartphones. It is integrated in our company, but I think it could be improved."
"Training in new advancements, technologies, or AI would help us understand how to best use the solution."
"When companies grow at a larger scale, they may shift to a different cloud services provider like AWS or Oracle."
"The price can be lowered significantly."
"If you go to AWS's site they offer training programs that are very good. SAP does not do the same, if SAP could provide some training that would be great."
"There are a few complexities when it comes to licensing that could be simplified."
"The platform's front-end user interface needs improvement compared to other applications."
"CPU architecture is an area where the solution currently has some issues. Improvement in CPU architecture could improve the performance side and the adherence to the parameters set by SAP."
"The product can be very complex."
"The AI aspect of SAP S4HANA can be improved."
"The documentation isn't clear enough."
"SAP S4HANA could be improved by adding a click-to-deploy model."
Google Cloud is ranked 4th in Infrastructure as a Service Clouds (IaaS) with 66 reviews while SAP S4HANA on AWS is ranked 7th in Infrastructure as a Service Clouds (IaaS) with 35 reviews. Google Cloud is rated 8.2, while SAP S4HANA on AWS is rated 8.2. The top reviewer of Google Cloud writes "Great for big data with off-the-charts scalability for storage and databases". On the other hand, the top reviewer of SAP S4HANA on AWS writes "With good documentation in place, the solution offers good technical support to its users". Google Cloud is most compared with Alibaba Cloud, Oracle Cloud Infrastructure (OCI), Linode, Pivotal Cloud Foundry and Amazon Lightsail, whereas SAP S4HANA on AWS is most compared with Microsoft Azure, SAP HANA Enterprise Cloud, Oracle Cloud Infrastructure (OCI), Amazon AWS and Alibaba Cloud. See our Google Cloud vs. SAP S4HANA on AWS report.
See our list of best Infrastructure as a Service Clouds (IaaS) vendors.
We monitor all Infrastructure as a Service Clouds (IaaS) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.