We performed a comparison between Google Firebase and Oracle Cloud Infrastructure (OCI) based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Infrastructure as a Service Clouds (IaaS) solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."I love Firebase's notifications, crash analytics, and bug tracking. It gives you detailed reporting about app usage and users."
"The most valuable feature of Google Firebase authentication and deployment."
"The solution is useful for managing users and user authentication."
"Firebase offers encryption out of the box."
"Its initial setup process is easy."
"Allows us to create functions without any infrastructure apart from the Google App Engine."
"If you are selling an app with extensive Firebase use, costs may go up."
"It is a stable solution...It is a very scalable solution."
"The solution is easy to use."
"The feature I think should be improved is the option to rename the machines."
"The most valuable feature is that it offers several adaptors."
"The solution is pretty straightforward to setup and use."
"The most valuable features of the solution are APEX, Threat Detector, and Cloud Guard."
"The environment is super fast so you get all the underlying machines behind the data. It's a good processing machine, especially in the Generation Two Cloud."
"The strength of this product is that they have many good database options, compared to other vendors."
"The deployment is most valuable feature."
"I rate the support from Google Firebase a four out of five."
"They have discontinued some very valuable features, including the Firebase UI that I used to log in."
"Google Cloud Functions (which is still a BETA version) needs to have more control over the uploaded functions. That is, it needs more options for controlling the functions itself."
"I would prefer Google Firebase to focus more on its integration capabilities since it is an area in the solution with certain shortcomings."
"The notifications must be made a little bit better."
"Integrations and extensions offered by the product are quite limited presently."
"I would like to see faster data migration and some support for other languages in the next release."
"I would like to have a facility for testing possible scenarios by writing dummy data and then doing different queries."
"They could add more features."
"The solution should integrate better with other tools and different vendors."
"There is room for improvement for stability."
"The solution requires tighter integration capabilities."
"Oracle Cloud could be improved with better third-party integrations."
"The solution isn't very mature. The on-premises deployment has more features and the cloud needs to work to match those options."
"There's a need for further customization to unlock the platform's full potential."
"The tool should provide more options like other cloud services. Also, it should improve scalability with the free version."
More Oracle Cloud Infrastructure (OCI) Pricing and Cost Advice →
Google Firebase is ranked 5th in Infrastructure as a Service Clouds (IaaS) with 32 reviews while Oracle Cloud Infrastructure (OCI) is ranked 3rd in Infrastructure as a Service Clouds (IaaS) with 91 reviews. Google Firebase is rated 8.4, while Oracle Cloud Infrastructure (OCI) is rated 7.8. The top reviewer of Google Firebase writes "An application development solution that has a lot of services like storage, Firestore, and push notifications". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Oracle Cloud Infrastructure (OCI) writes "Cost-effective and can be used to host OIC and APEX". Google Firebase is most compared with Microsoft Azure, Amazon AWS, DigitalOcean, Alibaba Cloud and Linode, whereas Oracle Cloud Infrastructure (OCI) is most compared with Microsoft Azure, Amazon AWS, Google Cloud, IBM Public Cloud and DigitalOcean. See our Google Firebase vs. Oracle Cloud Infrastructure (OCI) report.
See our list of best Infrastructure as a Service Clouds (IaaS) vendors.
We monitor all Infrastructure as a Service Clouds (IaaS) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.