We performed a comparison between HPE OneView and New Relic based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two IT Infrastructure Monitoring solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."It's rather simple to use, and that's very important for us."
"The remote support automatically logs service calls and support cases with HPE, which is really good."
"The most valuable features are the composable structure, infrastructure, and automation."
"The easy user interface was what I found most valuable in HPE OneView. For example, if I wanted to know the infrastructure status or I needed to send in any change commands, HPE OneView had simple buttons."
"Gives us one platform to monitor and access or configure all the servers or the 3PAR, etc."
"Have a single plane of glass across all of the server platforms."
"The OneView Global Dashboard is very user-friendly and it can be used for monitoring the power consumption and temperature of the data center and racks."
"Comprehensive dashboard, ease of use are key features."
"As New Relic is already integrated with Drupal, we can get our projects done with best practice and with the best value that we believe in."
"Working with the solution is very easy. It's user-friendly."
"The deep insights, which will give you the metrics (not a high level), so we can build out at the database level where the bottleneck is. This has been pretty helpful."
"New Relic has helped us in terms of the optimizing our print and loading times."
"The VPN is one of the solution's most valuable features for us."
"The monitoring so far has been good and we are happy with it."
"The feature I found most valuable is being able to design my queries. It's easy to design a query."
"It is a software solution as a service, so I don't have to manage it on-premise."
"I would like to see support for things that aren't in the current generation. We have a lot of 7th and 8th generation hardware."
"It needs more reporting capabilities."
"They can improve reporting and provide more customized reports. Currently, reporting is a bit limited. It can be complex to learn and manage for beginners. Because of my experience, I find it comfortable to manage, which might not be the case with beginners. It would be good if they can make it a little bit easier to understand. They can provide a more graphical view of connectivity and other things. Their technical support can also be improved."
"The main problem that we run into, as far as stability goes, is when something loses its profile. Sometimes it requires jumping through a number of "hoops" to really get it back."
"I would like to see them expand into other cloud platforms, non-HPE platforms."
"We ran into a couple of issues here and there with the baselines for the firmware and not having enough space on the appliance itself to be able to have more than two baselines."
"The solution could add storage, integration services, and end-to-end support for Cisco switches or other competitor products."
"One thing which is missing is that you can't actually log a support call yourself."
"It is very difficult to award the service level cycles at an endpoint level."
"They don't have an opportunity to share the dashboard with the public. If you want to share it with stakeholders or people outside the organization who just want to have a look at a couple of metrics, you can't do that without onboarding them to the product itself."
"How granular I could go down at looking at certain data, especially related to the operations, is limited."
"One thing I'd like to see in any APM, especially New Relic, is the ability to use distributed transactions. When one microservice calls another, it calls another database and microservice. The entire data visualization layer will not be able to correlate from one microservice from end to end and return on that path. Distributed transactions would be a great addition that would make life simpler. Unfortunately, no APM has that end-to-end capability."
"I would like to be able to invest less time in IT and ad hocs. We should be concentrating on other issues."
"The solution only supports the cloud platform and not on-premises."
"We would like to receive more AWS-specific details from the New Relic Dashboard, like EC2 health."
"The UX/UI design of New Relic APM could be improved. The solution currently has some slow pages in terms of loading and viewing the pages, for example, the reports. The reports and other pages take a long time to load."
HPE OneView is ranked 16th in IT Infrastructure Monitoring with 80 reviews while New Relic is ranked 5th in IT Infrastructure Monitoring with 152 reviews. HPE OneView is rated 8.0, while New Relic is rated 8.6. The top reviewer of HPE OneView writes "Provides firmware compliance and the ability to connect to iPO". On the other hand, the top reviewer of New Relic writes "Has a simple user interface and end-to-end monitoring and self-healing features". HPE OneView is most compared with Cisco Intersight, Dell CloudIQ, Zabbix and Lenovo XClarity Orchestrator, whereas New Relic is most compared with Dynatrace, Datadog, Elastic Observability, Grafana and Prometheus. See our HPE OneView vs. New Relic report.
See our list of best IT Infrastructure Monitoring vendors.
We monitor all IT Infrastructure Monitoring reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
