We performed a comparison between HPE Wireless WAN and Ruckus Wireless WAN based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Wireless WAN solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."The tool is easy to manage."
"Setting up the solution initially is very easy."
"The solution is easy to use."
"The most important is that the solution is stable."
"The performance is good."
"It's easy to use."
"We've found the scalability to be good."
"It is a good and stable solution."
"One of its notable advantages lies in the superior performance of its antennas and radios."
"Ruckus Wireless WAN is an easy-to-use solution."
"Provides great coverage and performance."
"Ruckus has multiple radios. Therefore, it supports high speed for users and clients. Other vendors have fluctuations in speed. The main thing about Ruckus is that you can trust it and rely on its speed. I am simply satisfied with it."
"The most valuable feature of Ruckus Wireless WAN is the antenna technology."
"We found the technical support to be helpful."
"It's highly scalable as long as the licenses are in place. You can expand it easily."
"What I like best about Ruckus Wireless WAN is easy administration. After installation, you'll benefit from how easy it is to administer the product. I also like that the product can cover the whole area with just a few endpoints."
"The scalability and the support could be better."
"I would say that the integration with other vendors in areas such as management or the visibility of other vendors in the management tools could be improved."
"HPE Wireless WAN could provide better access points and better pricing."
"The license cost of the product is an area where the prices are neither expensive nor cheap, leaving a scope for the prices to be lowered further."
"It's very old-fashioned, which is why we have made the decision to replace it."
"It should be a faster device."
"Stability could be improved, and technical support needs to be faster."
"Technical support could be improved. They could respond a bit faster."
"We had a problem with the delivery of the solution."
"We have one sole distributor here in our region. To have multiple distributors here would be very helpful to improve the supply chain."
"The solution could be more stable."
"The controller could be made less complicated, so those who are less technically sound can maintain it."
"I have some friends who have not heard of Ruckus, but are aware of other competitors."
"The solution needs to offer more analytics."
"Technical support is something that needs to be improved."
"I believe there is room for improvement in the price structure."
HPE Wireless WAN is ranked 7th in Wireless WAN with 18 reviews while Ruckus Wireless WAN is ranked 2nd in Wireless WAN with 45 reviews. HPE Wireless WAN is rated 7.8, while Ruckus Wireless WAN is rated 8.2. The top reviewer of HPE Wireless WAN writes " A tool that ensures to provide seamless connectivity to its users". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Ruckus Wireless WAN writes " Offers robust outdoor connectivity, but signal strength and support need improvement". HPE Wireless WAN is most compared with , whereas Ruckus Wireless WAN is most compared with Ubiquiti Wireless and Cambium Networks Wireless WAN. See our HPE Wireless WAN vs. Ruckus Wireless WAN report.
See our list of best Wireless WAN vendors.
We monitor all Wireless WAN reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.