We performed a comparison between Hyper-V and Odin Virtuozzo Containers based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about Proxmox, VMware, Microsoft and others in Server Virtualization Software."It is very easy to install. It can be done in a day."
"It works very well. Its performance, stability, and redundancy are all very dependable."
"Hyper-V improved the infrastructure drastically, not only from a performance perspective but from a control/administration view as well."
"The most valuable features are ease of use, and it gets the job done in a straightforward manner."
"The Failover Clustering feature allows us to be able to make our most critical workload highly available."
"The restore function of the virtual server is valuable to me."
"We can perform maintenance on equipment during the day because we can live migrate all of the machines from one server to another."
"Hyper-V deployment is very user-friendly. It supports partial scripting and offers a UI for a smooth experience. There's also PowerShell scripting available for advanced users."
"When you run templates on the containers on Virtuozzo they have a lot of back-ups."
"Hyper-V requires improvement with manageability."
"The biggest problem with Hyper-V is that the virtual machines are mostly running on top of the Windows Server, so we often need to reboot the machine and virtual machines when updating the host level. That's why we prefer VMware. It's much easier to patch the host. Also, Hyper-V has security vulnerabilities. It's easy to attack and compromise the host."
"Hyper-V needs to improve its support."
"There is a hard limitation of 20 gigs per file with Dropbox, so you've got to overcome that by chunking the zip files into something smaller and manageable."
"Status and availability became an issue and need."
"When one server or one virtual machine fails, or one is turned off, the virtualization stops, and we have to initiate again with human intervention."
"The initial setup was complex. It was nearly six years ago, but I remember it was complicated."
"Hyper-V doesn't have a lot of features and is limited compared to other virtualization software."
"Odin Virtuozzo has poor support and needs to improve."
Hyper-V is ranked 3rd in Server Virtualization Software with 134 reviews while Odin Virtuozzo Containers is ranked 12th in Server Virtualization Software with 2 reviews. Hyper-V is rated 8.0, while Odin Virtuozzo Containers is rated 6.0. The top reviewer of Hyper-V writes "It's a low-cost solution that enabled us to shrink everything down into a single server ". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Odin Virtuozzo Containers writes "Significant backup for containers, but the customer service is terrible". Hyper-V is most compared with VMware vSphere, VMware Workstation, Proxmox VE and KVM, whereas Odin Virtuozzo Containers is most compared with Proxmox VE, Nutanix AHV Virtualization, KVM and VMware vSphere.
See our list of best Server Virtualization Software vendors.
We monitor all Server Virtualization Software reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.