We performed a comparison between Nutanix AHV Virtualization and Odin Virtuozzo Containers based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about Proxmox, VMware, Microsoft and others in Server Virtualization Software."The interface is very good, and quite user-friendly."
"The solution is user-friendly and provides good virtual machine backups. The user interface gets updated when there is a new release."
"It's user-friendly."
"This solution is very stable and it has been running for the last three months, with no issues."
"Nutanix AHV Virtualization has good performance and can be used for backup and disaster."
"The most valuable feature of Nutanix AHV is that it can be managed through Hyper-V, which is Microsoft's hypervisor, VMware, and Citrix XenServer."
"The storage features and volume system are great."
"Nutanix is good for new implementations on the VM side. It's very good for disaster recovery and final storage."
"When you run templates on the containers on Virtuozzo they have a lot of back-ups."
"If we have to opt for a high level of capacity planning and need more analytics—like deciding on new purchases or budgeting, or if we need additional resources in the near future—we need to pay for Prism Central. I would suggest that Nutanix improve a bit on the analytics part of Prism Element so we can calculate those kinds of things within that flavor."
"If you have the need for special hardware like FibreChannel-Cards or such and there is no networked-way around it (such as you could work with USB Dongles via an HW-Dongle-Server of network), you have to use a separate hypervisor."
"It worked well in the beginning but after using it for some time, we found some limitations in terms of compatibility with other software."
"An improvement would be for Nutanix AHV to support VMDK, AOS, Hyper-V, and VMware."
"The technical support for this solution needs to be improved in terms of response time."
"It would be better if the solution's replication to another site could be efficiently optimized."
"The licensing costs are a little bit expensive."
"Nutanix misses alerts sometimes."
"Odin Virtuozzo has poor support and needs to improve."
Nutanix AHV Virtualization is ranked 6th in Server Virtualization Software with 48 reviews while Odin Virtuozzo Containers is ranked 12th in Server Virtualization Software with 2 reviews. Nutanix AHV Virtualization is rated 8.6, while Odin Virtuozzo Containers is rated 6.0. The top reviewer of Nutanix AHV Virtualization writes "Lightweight, integrates well, and the technical support is responsive". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Odin Virtuozzo Containers writes "Significant backup for containers, but the customer service is terrible". Nutanix AHV Virtualization is most compared with Proxmox VE, Hyper-V, VMware vSphere, KVM and Nutanix Cloud Infrastructure (NCI), whereas Odin Virtuozzo Containers is most compared with Proxmox VE, Hyper-V, KVM and VMware vSphere.
See our list of best Server Virtualization Software vendors.
We monitor all Server Virtualization Software reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.