We performed a comparison between Imperva DDoS and Indusface AppTrana based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about Amazon Web Services (AWS), F5, Microsoft and others in Web Application Firewall (WAF)."It is an effective threat mitigation tool."
"The solution is very good at intercepting traffic before it gets to our data centers."
"Gives us the ability to trace each connection, and to have logs to be able to differentiate between a positive and a false-positive intruder action."
"On the site security, I can see which countries have incidents, whether it was a robot attack, a real human user, or non-human user."
"They're quite easy to install and quite easy to set up. Clients really like that. Especially when you're dealing with the cloud, it's really easy."
"On the real time, you can see live traffic, which is flowing into our website."
"On the activity log, I can see the exact details, the visit, and the threat."
"The technical support is excellent."
"We use Indusface AppTrana as a firewall."
"The log analytics interface within Incapsula isn't really good. For example, if you have to get all logs from there, it's a very cumbersome process."
"Imperva should have more points of presence in Africa."
"It's quite expensive."
"The product could use a broader scope in the area of policies."
"I would like to see automated reporting to improve visibility."
"I am not sure if this application has a policy where you can create your custom policy and run it as our firewall. We should have some ability to also create some custom policy, then run it as a firewall."
"The cost could be lower; our end clients need to have a high budget to purchase this solution."
"The weakest point of Imperva is their first level of support, which should be improved. They should also improve the access and security logs viewing directly on the portal. I would like to see better access and security logs through the portal and not only through a SIM solution. Currently, if you want to explore your access and security logs from Imperva, you need a SIM tool or a SIM infrastructure on your side to do it. You can't do it manually or directly through the portal, which is a big problem for us. I had a call yesterday with Imperva for the roadmap, and I just told them this. They agreed that this is an improvement point from their side."
"The solution should add an enhanced dashboard to make it easy to navigate."
Imperva DDoS is ranked 18th in Web Application Firewall (WAF) with 74 reviews while Indusface AppTrana is ranked 26th in Web Application Firewall (WAF) with 1 review. Imperva DDoS is rated 8.8, while Indusface AppTrana is rated 9.0. The top reviewer of Imperva DDoS writes "I like the content monitoring feature which I haven't seen in other WAF solutions". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Indusface AppTrana writes "Cost-effective and used as an effective firewall". Imperva DDoS is most compared with Cloudflare, Akamai, Arbor DDoS, Radware DefensePro and AWS WAF, whereas Indusface AppTrana is most compared with F5 Advanced WAF, Azure Web Application Firewall, Cloudflare Web Application Firewall, Radware DefensePro and AWS WAF.
See our list of best Web Application Firewall (WAF) vendors and best Distributed Denial of Service (DDOS) Protection vendors.
We monitor all Web Application Firewall (WAF) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.