We performed a comparison between JIRA Portfolio and Oracle Primavera Portfolio Management based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Enterprise Agile Planning Tools solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."The status update function is the most valuable feature."
"The initial setup is simple."
"Has many functionalities including good supervision and workflows."
"The most valuable feature of JIRA Portfolio is the visuals it provides rather than Kanban boarded tickets."
"The tool helps us achieve more within the stipulated timeline and budget."
"The most valuable feature of the JIRA Portfolio is for managing teams of 10 or more. It can track the program level and portfolio. There are plenty of beneficial features, such as the hierarchy-level view, customization, and structure plugin."
"Its stability is very reliable."
"The customized workflows we can define are very valuable. JIRA's private projects is very useful as well. There are also a lot of plugins that they provide."
"The solution's tech support is good."
"I like Primavera's planning capabilities."
"The ability to streamline the process of obtaining signatures from our contractors is valuable."
"The most valuable feature of Oracle Primavera Portfolio Management is accuracy."
"Oracle Primavera Portfolio Management is a well-engineered product from an IT perspective."
"We are based in India; I would like the product to integrate local pricing. We earn in rupees but spend in dollars. Its pricing could also be lowered."
"I think their view needs to be more user friendly. The UI makes it difficult to find things. Secondly, the configuration is very complex. JIRA should help people find out what configuration they are using."
"We would love to be able to have direct contact with Atlassian. Currently, they are not working directly with West African countries. We are considering using JIRA Align, but when we contact them, they say that as we are in West Africa, they don't directly work with West Africa."
"Requires some effort to insert functionalities and that could be simplified."
"There should be an integration of efforts between the cloud service providers' side and JIRA Portfolio."
"The data query language needs improvement."
"Some key features like integration, big data warehousing and data modeling need work."
"With Jira, an issue that arises is the length of time it takes to show certain data."
"They should work on integrating the solution with ERP."
"The scalability has room for improvement."
"Primavera could be better integrated with other products, and it needs more cost management features."
"The reporting could improve project management. We need multiple source reports. If someone is new to the support it has a steep learning curve."
"The solution's user interface is an area with shortcomings that need improvement."
More Oracle Primavera Portfolio Management Pricing and Cost Advice →
JIRA Portfolio is ranked 4th in Enterprise Agile Planning Tools with 55 reviews while Oracle Primavera Portfolio Management is ranked 11th in Project Portfolio Management with 6 reviews. JIRA Portfolio is rated 8.2, while Oracle Primavera Portfolio Management is rated 7.2. The top reviewer of JIRA Portfolio writes "Powerful, flexible solution with a bit of a learning curve". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Oracle Primavera Portfolio Management writes "It helps us track progress and results". JIRA Portfolio is most compared with Jira Align, Microsoft Azure DevOps, Microsoft Project Server, Adobe Workfront and Broadcom Clarity , whereas Oracle Primavera Portfolio Management is most compared with EcoSys, Microsoft Project Server, Broadcom Clarity , LoadSpring SpringBoard Cloud Portal and Artemis Enterprise. See our JIRA Portfolio vs. Oracle Primavera Portfolio Management report.
We monitor all Enterprise Agile Planning Tools reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.