We performed a comparison between Microsoft Project Server and Oracle Primavera Portfolio Management based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Project Portfolio Management solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."The most valuable feature of the solution stems from the fact that the tool's reporting is very good."
"The solution is scalable and easy to expand."
"Capacity management and task baselining are the most valuable features of Microsoft Project Server."
"The ability to track a project's progress using Microsoft Project Server is the most valuable aspect. It depends, especially when managing multiple projects."
"The solution has easy integration with Excel."
"The solution, overall, is excellent for project planning."
"It's stable and reliable."
"Technical support is very responsive - particularly on critical tickets."
"Oracle Primavera Portfolio Management is a well-engineered product from an IT perspective."
"The ability to streamline the process of obtaining signatures from our contractors is valuable."
"The solution's tech support is good."
"The most valuable feature of Oracle Primavera Portfolio Management is accuracy."
"I like Primavera's planning capabilities."
"The solution must provide Agile and AI features."
"Collaboration within the tool is lacking when you compare it to online or cloud-based tools."
"It would be better if the solution had some more training or resources available for a person who is new to Microsoft Project Server."
"It is not updated in real-time. Sometimes it, therefore, is not accurate."
"Stability of the solution is an area with certain shortcomings where improvements are required."
"Permission management needs improvement."
"The price of the solution could be reduced."
"We are on the on-prem version. The cloud, however, gives more regular updates that we can take advantage of."
"The scalability has room for improvement."
"They should work on integrating the solution with ERP."
"The reporting could improve project management. We need multiple source reports. If someone is new to the support it has a steep learning curve."
"The solution's user interface is an area with shortcomings that need improvement."
"Primavera could be better integrated with other products, and it needs more cost management features."
More Oracle Primavera Portfolio Management Pricing and Cost Advice →
Microsoft Project Server is ranked 5th in Project Portfolio Management with 56 reviews while Oracle Primavera Portfolio Management is ranked 11th in Project Portfolio Management with 6 reviews. Microsoft Project Server is rated 8.0, while Oracle Primavera Portfolio Management is rated 7.2. The top reviewer of Microsoft Project Server writes "Provides holistic reporting and allows us to keep track of what's going on with projects". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Oracle Primavera Portfolio Management writes "It helps us track progress and results". Microsoft Project Server is most compared with Microsoft Project, ServiceNow Strategic Portfolio Management, Planisware, JIRA Portfolio and Broadcom Clarity , whereas Oracle Primavera Portfolio Management is most compared with EcoSys, JIRA Portfolio, Broadcom Clarity , LoadSpring SpringBoard Cloud Portal and Artemis Enterprise. See our Microsoft Project Server vs. Oracle Primavera Portfolio Management report.
See our list of best Project Portfolio Management vendors.
We monitor all Project Portfolio Management reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
