We performed a comparison between Kaspersky Endpoint Detection and Response Expert and Trend Vision One based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR) solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."Having all monitoring, response, tracking, and mitigation tools in one dashboard provides our analysts and SOC team with a comprehensive view at a glance."
"The ease of deployment and configuration is valuable. It's very easy compared to other vendors like Sophos. Sophos' configuration is complex. Fortinet is a lot easier to understand. You don't need a lot of admin knowledge to do the configuration."
"Fortinet FortiEDR made our clients feel secure and more at ease, knowing that they had an EDR solution that would close the gap in their security posture."
"The main thing is that I feel safe. Because the processes that have been used to get a handle on the attackers are much better than other competitors"
"Fortinet FortiEDR's scalability is quite good, and you can add licenses to the solution."
"The most valuable feature is the analysis, because of the beta structure."
"This is stable and scalable."
"The solution was relatively easy to deploy."
"The content filtering options are good."
"The integration with our hypervisor is quite smooth, especially within the Kaspersky Enterprise environment. We have many virtual machines, and the integration is helpful."
"Kaspersky is easy to use, and it performs well."
"The product is very easy to use."
"The detection engine running on endpoints works very well and provides a good protection level."
"The solution does a good job of filtering and blocking unusual traffic."
"The most valuable features are the reports."
"Provides web and DNS protection over https."
More Kaspersky Endpoint Detection and Response Expert Pros →
"The telemetric report is the most valuable feature."
"It has good vulnerability protection."
"The most important thing for us as a customer is that we can spend more time in other places as it's simpler to have that overview. We have much more time for other tasks."
"The search features help us try to correlate information and identify any suspicious activity."
"The most valuable feature is the network protection shield on every server, which isolates attacks and prevents our clients from being affected."
"I like XDR's workbench feature and observed attack technique. It generates an alert once certain conditions are met. For example, let's say there's a threat called malicious.exe being deployed on your system. It will generate an alert with information like the file path, location, hash, etc. You also see a relational matrix showing how that file was executed and which processes were installed."
"Scaling is not a problem at all."
"The integration is also nice because there are many external tools that we can connect to the platform, such as configuration management tools. Because the platform is integrated, I can manage almost the whole company across our global organization."
"FortiEDR can be improved by providing more detailed reporting."
"I think cloud security and SASE are areas of concern in the product where improvements are required. The tool's cloud version has to be improved in terms of the security it offers."
"It takes about two business days for initial support, which is too slow in urgent situations."
"I would like the solution to extend beyond endpoint protection and include other attack surfaces such as other network components."
"We've encountered challenges during API deployment, occasionally resulting in unstable environments."
"The amount of usage, the number of details we get, or the number of options that can be tweaked is limited in comparison to that with other EDR solutions"
"I haven't seen the use of AI in the solution."
"The SIEM could be improved."
"We would like to have better strategic information."
"My opinion is that behavior detection could work better. This feature gets a high rate of false positives."
"They could provide a source of visualization for the product."
"I would like better integration with other products."
"The solution does not offer much support to its users in Spanish, so I would like to see them offer more support in Spanish."
"It consumes many system resources."
"The solution lacks DLP."
"It's not a simple implementation."
More Kaspersky Endpoint Detection and Response Expert Cons →
"Having more variables within the playbook would be useful. It would allow us to have more refined playbooks for the business. It would allow us to take stronger action through a playbook. It will give us confidence to target a particular area of business where our risk tolerance might be higher or lower. We would like to have more granular playbooks."
"There isn't a lot I'd do to change it. The web interface could be improved to sort of make it a little easier to manage multiple clients out of one location. It could also be made a bit easier to sort of manage the licensing side of it."
"We'd like to see a few more integrations."
"They are planning on adding the Security Playbooks as a complete feature. In the preview mode, it is available; however, it is not released."
"The support documentation could be more comprehensive."
"Reporting could be a little bit better. They are working on it, and it is getting better."
"The centralized dashboard has room for improvement."
"It would be ideal if they could improve the control of connectivity between sensors."
More Kaspersky Endpoint Detection and Response Expert Pricing and Cost Advice →
Kaspersky Endpoint Detection and Response Expert is ranked 17th in Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR) with 44 reviews while Trend Vision One is ranked 5th in Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR) with 43 reviews. Kaspersky Endpoint Detection and Response Expert is rated 8.2, while Trend Vision One is rated 8.6. The top reviewer of Kaspersky Endpoint Detection and Response Expert writes "Solid security and performance; overall a useful tool". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Trend Vision One writes "The integration of toolsets is key, enabling automation, and vendor has been tremendous partner for us". Kaspersky Endpoint Detection and Response Expert is most compared with Microsoft Defender for Endpoint, Cynet, IBM Security QRadar, Symantec Endpoint Detection and Response and Check Point Harmony Endpoint, whereas Trend Vision One is most compared with CrowdStrike Falcon, Trend Micro Apex One, SentinelOne Singularity Complete, Microsoft Defender XDR and Cisco SecureX. See our Kaspersky Endpoint Detection and Response Expert vs. Trend Vision One report.
See our list of best Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR) vendors and best Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR) vendors.
We monitor all Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.