We performed a comparison between MarkLogic and MongoDB based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two NoSQL Databases solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."MarkLogic's greatest asset is its strong engineering foundation. It was specifically designed with search capabilities in mind, and the developers placed a great emphasis on ensuring the quality of the indexing and all subsequent layers that were added."
"The rules can show us if there are missing items, like titles, and we can add them in to ensure everything is filled and makes sense and there are no missing details."
"It can handle a lot of files quickly."
"The clustering is very good. It allows us to have high availability."
"The reports are useful for controlling the load of our whole architecture."
"MongoDB is extremely developer-friendly because when you are starting, there is very little time needed upfront in terms of planning."
"MongoDB is simpler to learn and implement than traditional SQL solutions like MySQL."
"It is easy to use."
"I value the API integrations."
"One of the most valuable features of MongoDB is it is Its open source."
"One of the most common requests is to improve the user interface of the database. While it is primarily a database, there are other databases available that offer more user-friendly interfaces. The UI is good for developers but not for regular users. More visuals would be beneficial."
"The spreadsheet capabilities could be improved."
"It could be more stable. It would be better if it were more user-friendly like Oracle, which is very easy. For example, creating an index is simple in Oracle. In MongoDB, it's quite challenging to do that. Performance could be better. It's fast and good, but you cannot put every application that you would like to in MongoDB."
"Data encryption is possible using third-party tools but they should have their own encryption capability built-in to this solution."
"The transaction could use improvement. From MySQL, for example, you cannot create a transaction if you are reading and writing a document at the same time."
"MongoDB would be improved with more integration, particularly for cloud environments like Google BigQuery."
"The stability could be improved."
"I don't see a lot of areas that need improvement."
"Simplifying the aggregation framework would be an improvement."
"MongoDB is a very useful and convenient choice, but sometimes for more complex projects, there are certain niche requirements that appear, so using a different tool could be beneficial. It raises the complexity of the architecture, but it could be beneficial to the world, the features, the ease of the features which are being implemented."
MarkLogic is ranked 9th in NoSQL Databases with 2 reviews while MongoDB is ranked 1st in NoSQL Databases with 70 reviews. MarkLogic is rated 9.6, while MongoDB is rated 8.2. The top reviewer of MarkLogic writes "Frequent updates, helpful search capabilities, and high quality support". On the other hand, the top reviewer of MongoDB writes "Lightweight with good flexibility and very fast performance for searching data". MarkLogic is most compared with Cassandra, whereas MongoDB is most compared with InfluxDB, Couchbase, ScyllaDB, Cassandra and Oracle NoSQL. See our MarkLogic vs. MongoDB report.
See our list of best NoSQL Databases vendors.
We monitor all NoSQL Databases reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.