We performed a comparison between Matrix42 Unified Endpoint Management and Microsoft Intune based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Unified Endpoint Management (UEM) solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."Matrix42 Enterprise Mobility Management offers on-premises deployment."
"The most valuable feature of this solution is the ability to assign a package to a user on a system If you have your software packages set up via SCCM. It automates the process, which is very convenient, especially since most of our people are remote. Additionally, the overall functionality is good."
"Intune's unified endpoint management platform is invaluable."
"We can securely manage both company-owned devices and personal devices enrolled in our BYOD program."
"The ability to push applications on devices is valuable. You do not have to manually install applications one by one. If you like to use ten different applications, you do not have to manually go and download them one by one. Intune can compile a package for you, and then you can just push them from the admin center."
"Stable solution at a good price."
"In terms of technical support, you will get an immediate response."
"The most valuable feature is probably mobile device management. Small businesses are coming under greater scrutiny and requirements for compliance as time goes on. We don't have to worry about a VPN because we can manage these devices, control company data, and lock users out. If needed, we can remotely wipe devices and deadman-switch them."
"It works well if you have a Microsoft environment."
"Stable product that's easy to set up compared to other MDM products."
"Matrix42 Enterprise Mobility Management could improve the user interface, it is not very intuitive."
"In terms of integration, there is still room for improvement in Matrix42."
"Intune doesn't provide much control over Windows servers. It's something we struggle with."
"The policies we had in SCCM and AD offered features that are missing from Microsoft Intune."
"Data leak prevention can be integrated into it. Currently, it does not have data leak prevention."
"The closest Microsoft Intune can be to GPOs, the better. There needs to be more granularity on application deployments. However, they have done better recently with the application deployments."
"Microsoft Intune is not user-friendly to manage and has room for improvement."
"It should be easier to define policies and comply with those policies."
"While Intune works perfectly well, the only potential downside is that the deployment could be a bit complex for some users."
"When Microsoft Intune is used with different android devices it does not always work as it is supposed to."
More Matrix42 Unified Endpoint Management Pricing and Cost Advice →
Matrix42 Unified Endpoint Management is ranked 10th in Unified Endpoint Management (UEM) with 2 reviews while Microsoft Intune is ranked 1st in Unified Endpoint Management (UEM) with 166 reviews. Matrix42 Unified Endpoint Management is rated 8.6, while Microsoft Intune is rated 8.0. The top reviewer of Matrix42 Unified Endpoint Management writes "It is a complete and competitive solution with excellent OEM support". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Microsoft Intune writes "We can manage all aspects of our devices from a single console, easy to scale, and quick to deploy". Matrix42 Unified Endpoint Management is most compared with Ivanti Neurons for MDM and ManageEngine Endpoint Central, whereas Microsoft Intune is most compared with Jamf Pro, VMware Workspace ONE, ManageEngine Endpoint Central, Microsoft Entra ID and SOTI MobiControl. See our Matrix42 Unified Endpoint Management vs. Microsoft Intune report.
See our list of best Unified Endpoint Management (UEM) vendors and best Enterprise Mobility Management (EMM) vendors.
We monitor all Unified Endpoint Management (UEM) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.