We performed a comparison between Microsoft Configuration Manager and SanerNow CyberHygiene Platform based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about Microsoft, HCLTech, Kaseya and others in Patch Management."With the SCCM inventory, we found a lot of rogue applications. We were able to identify them, find out who was running them, and either put them on our application list or remove them."
"It's a stable product."
"I like a lot of the reporting capabilities and baseline configurations."
"We're a Microsoft-centric organization, so we are happy with the integration between products."
"It is a very well-rounded product. It is a complete package with all the features using which we are able to manage our PCs very efficiently."
"The most valuable feature of Microsoft Endpoint Configuration Manager is it's incredibly simple to configure and execute changes in bulk, allowing for seamless deployment. With this solution, you can easily track the status of all modifications and send them with ease, making it a comprehensive and efficient solution for any necessary adjustments."
"The initial setup is straightforward and not too complicated."
"I have found the solution to be scalable. We have around 50,000 users using the solution."
"Although it is, in fact, a complete vulnerability management solution, the most valuable feature is the patch management functionality. Most of our customers give preference to this tool over other tools when it comes to patch management."
"This solution should be simpler, and more consistent across modules/sections."
"The solution should be more compatible with different versions of Linux."
"It would be nice to have everything in one place. Now they have Intune for the desktops and SCCM to handle their servers."
"It should provide the ability to remotely connect to mobile devices. There are some solutions that are doing that, but with Microsoft Intune, the only way to remotely connect to devices outside the organization and mobile devices is by using TeamViewer. It is pretty strange for a big company like Microsoft to not have something for that."
"Microsoft should extend support for additional platforms."
"SCCM does not scale well, which is one of the reasons we are not going to continue to use it."
"The setup was complex and I faced a lot of problems initially because I was new to the solution."
"In spite of us being a premier customer we find the support unsatisfactory."
"SanerNow has good integration with the more well known ITSM tools, but at the same time there are many other ITSM (IT Service Management) tools available in the market, including local tools here in India, and I'm not sure how SanerNow plans to integrate with them all out of the box."
More Microsoft Configuration Manager Pricing and Cost Advice →
More SanerNow CyberHygiene Platform Pricing and Cost Advice →
Microsoft Configuration Manager is ranked 1st in Patch Management with 78 reviews while SanerNow CyberHygiene Platform is ranked 12th in Patch Management with 1 review. Microsoft Configuration Manager is rated 8.2, while SanerNow CyberHygiene Platform is rated 10.0. The top reviewer of Microsoft Configuration Manager writes "Seamless system updates, useful integration, and reliable". On the other hand, the top reviewer of SanerNow CyberHygiene Platform writes "Advanced vulnerability Management solution with out-of-the-box integrations". Microsoft Configuration Manager is most compared with Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform, ManageEngine Endpoint Central, Microsoft Intune, BigFix and Tanium, whereas SanerNow CyberHygiene Platform is most compared with Qualys VMDR, Tenable Nessus, Rapid7 InsightVM, BigFix and NinjaOne.
See our list of best Patch Management vendors.
We monitor all Patch Management reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.