We performed a comparison between Microsoft Defender Vulnerability Management and Tenable Vulnerability Management based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Vulnerability Management solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."One valuable feature is the Microsoft Security Scorecard."
"The product's stability is very high...The scalability of the product is amazing."
"The product’s most valuable features are compliance, recommendations, and inventories."
"The solution is up-to-date and helps prevent zero-day attacks."
"The solution helps identify threats and vulnerabilities."
"The product is easy to use."
"It is very stable, and it is updated periodically by adding new vulnerabilities."
"They are on a good trajectory as a company and investing in R&D in the right ways."
"The tool has an easy-to-use interface."
"The vulnerability scanning is the most important aspect of the solution for us."
"The best feature of the solution is the amount of visibility it provides of the vulnerabilities."
"The vulnerability management itself is the most valuable feature as well as references to the mitigation techniques."
"You can customize each point in new scans."
"The general support could be improved."
"The technical support takes too much time to resolve tickets."
"Integration can be improved."
"It is challenging to extract and customize reports from the system."
"The setup phase of the product is not that easy and needs a person to have a certain level of expertise."
"I'm not satisfied with the reporting structure."
"The only drawback of the solution is that it is expensive."
"It can have more integration."
"It's not a user-friendly tool since it has a complicated interface."
"The solution is a bit slow."
"They should include better customization of the dashboard, and integration tools."
"The solution must provide penetration testing."
"The solution must be promoted more in the market."
More Microsoft Defender Vulnerability Management Pricing and Cost Advice →
More Tenable Vulnerability Management Pricing and Cost Advice →
Microsoft Defender Vulnerability Management is ranked 23rd in Vulnerability Management with 5 reviews while Tenable Vulnerability Management is ranked 2nd in Vulnerability Management with 39 reviews. Microsoft Defender Vulnerability Management is rated 8.2, while Tenable Vulnerability Management is rated 8.2. The top reviewer of Microsoft Defender Vulnerability Management writes "The vulnerability assessment is very accurate because it runs directly into the vulnerability database". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Tenable Vulnerability Management writes "Discovers vulnerabilities and integrates well with other solutions". Microsoft Defender Vulnerability Management is most compared with Qualys VMDR, Tenable Nessus, Rapid7 InsightVM, Microsoft Sentinel and Microsoft Defender XDR, whereas Tenable Vulnerability Management is most compared with Tenable Security Center, Tenable Nessus, Qualys VMDR, Amazon Inspector and Rapid7 InsightVM. See our Microsoft Defender Vulnerability Management vs. Tenable Vulnerability Management report.
See our list of best Vulnerability Management vendors and best Risk-Based Vulnerability Management vendors.
We monitor all Vulnerability Management reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.