We performed a comparison between Microsoft .NET Framework and WebLogic Suite based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Application Infrastructure solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."The .NET framework is a mature platform that is very helpful and saves time during the software development process."
"The web development and Microsoft Windows service development capabilities are among the most valuable features offered by the Microsoft .NET Framework. This language platform is highly user-friendly, with plenty of online examples and information available, as well as a robust development environment."
"The addition of generics to handle common functionality across types, and the more recent upgrade of the dataset to the Entity Framework, has cut development time drastically, while increasing quality and confidence between builds."
"When we talk about .NET development, we use Visual Studio IDE to create these things. In recent years, there have been a lot of improvements in Visual Studio 2022. It would be a daunting task to list all of the features that have benefited us, as it would require a lot of time and effort. However, there are definitely many improvements year after year in .NET development."
"It's easy to create and integrate things."
"Ease of use, the richness of the libraries and basically very good development tools."
"The solution's technical support is very good...The product's initial setup phase was easy."
"Given that it's cross-platform right now, where you can use it on Windows and Mac, that is the single most significant feature that has resulted in wider adoption of .NET."
"The solution is very scalable. It's easy to add processes even if you are new to the solution."
"The product is reliable."
"It easily connects to other Oracle products and services."
"It integrates well with other solutions."
"This is a robust solution."
"Robust solution; console and enterprise management tools are really easy to work."
"The program is scalable."
"WebLogic adds a lot of value to business and investments."
"The product is nearing its sunset, and we think that by 2028, we won't get support anymore"
"There are performance constraints when multiple users are accessing the application and that consumes CPU resources."
"The integration with DevOps tools, such as Azure DevOps, Jira, and GitLab, would be a valuable addition."
"They should have more training materials available that are specific to .NET. We spend a lot of money training our engineers."
"If Microsoft would provide a monthly subscription at a cost that a developer can afford then it would be really helpful."
"Difficult to scale this product for large organizations."
"The integration could improve in Microsoft .NET Framework."
"The solution could improve by optimizing the memory for better performance."
"The licensing for the solution is pretty expensive. It may be the most expensive solution, if you were to compare it to the competition."
"The support is not good."
"Support could be better. The expertise when we have some Oracle WebLogic issues and challenges is not there. The issues are not being addressed in time. This really needs to be improved going forward."
"The content search is not easy."
"The solution needs to share more information in terms of training. There needs to be more documentation involved to help those who are completely new to the product."
"This solution would benefit from the inclusion of a ripple start function for clusters."
"Lacking a solution for smaller applications."
"I noticed a few areas for improvement in WebLogic Suite. If you use the pure play higher-availability features, then yes, it can be switched over to the other system from the high-availability point of view, but that comes with a certain price. If you prefer simpler high-availability, that requires manual intervention. I'd also recommend a tuning feature in WebLogic Suite because it's not self-tuning, and this means you need thorough expertise to do the tuning and leverage the best benefit out of it. If Oracle makes WebLogic Suite automated or self-driven, then it becomes a wonderful product, similar to what Oracle did for the Autonomous Database which is self-driven or has an autonomous operating system. If automation is added in the next release of the solution, combined with more affordable pricing, though as a technical person, I know how much goes into having automation as a feature, and it could be difficult to lower the price, but if Oracle can do it, then that would make WebLogic Suite better."
Microsoft .NET Framework is ranked 4th in Application Infrastructure with 47 reviews while WebLogic Suite is ranked 11th in Application Infrastructure with 31 reviews. Microsoft .NET Framework is rated 8.4, while WebLogic Suite is rated 8.2. The top reviewer of Microsoft .NET Framework writes "Intuitive, easier to develop, maintain, and migrate from the old framework to newer versions". On the other hand, the top reviewer of WebLogic Suite writes "Simple setup, reliable, and performs well". Microsoft .NET Framework is most compared with IIS, Magic xpa Application Platform, JBoss Enterprise Application Platform, Apache Web Server and IBM WebSphere Application Server, whereas WebLogic Suite is most compared with Oracle SOA Suite, Oracle WebCenter, NGINX Plus and Apache Web Server. See our Microsoft .NET Framework vs. WebLogic Suite report.
See our list of best Application Infrastructure vendors.
We monitor all Application Infrastructure reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.