We performed a comparison between Oracle SOA Suite and WebLogic Suite based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Application Infrastructure solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."This is one of the critical products for my company and we use it extensively. We currently use each and every feature of Oracle SOA."
"It performs better in real-time transactions."
"In Oracle SOA Suite some applications are not able to use REST, but it can support both SOAP and REST. You're able to integrate quite a lot of systems, which may not be able to in other solutions. You can also use XML and JSON. It is a standardizing type of tool. It doesn't matter whether I'm using JSON or XML, it can convert them."
"Enables our Product Manager to post products to different outside EC platforms with only one interface and one process."
"The solution's XSLT or XSL Transformation feature was very useful."
"The most valuable feature of this solution is the option to design, and the development can happen at the same time."
"The most valuable features for us are the APIs, which we commonly use, as well as the scheduling capabilities and file transfers."
"I would rate my experience with the initial setup an eight out of ten, where one is difficult, and ten is easy."
"Scalability on the solution is great. It's very very easy to scale."
"The program is scalable."
"A valuable feature is its integration with Oracle Database."
"The transaction handling of WebLogic and the way it is designed is excellent."
"The most valuable feature is that it provides one place where you can control all of the services."
"This is a robust solution."
"The solution is useful for centralizing data."
"The feature that I have found to be the most valuable is the ease of deployment."
"The solutions can improve the communication or translations between formats, such as JSON and XML. The JSON REST API could improve."
"The solution’s initial setup is complex and could be improved."
"I would like to see divided containers more separately as a microservice."
"Other solutions might be better componets such as Salesforce."
"Its function options can be improved."
"Another area of improvement is performance. Because with multiple solutions connecting to the SOA platform, the performance of the SOA platform can be affected in time. So, that could be one area that could be improved with the SOA."
"SOA"
"The web services need to be more robust."
"Support could be better. The expertise when we have some Oracle WebLogic issues and challenges is not there. The issues are not being addressed in time. This really needs to be improved going forward."
"The licensing for the solution is pretty expensive. It may be the most expensive solution, if you were to compare it to the competition."
"I think the support could be much better."
"The solution needs to share more information in terms of training. There needs to be more documentation involved to help those who are completely new to the product."
"This solution doesn't have connectors to other external applications."
"I would like to see the licensing policy simplified."
"The support is not good."
"The content search is not easy."
Oracle SOA Suite is ranked 8th in Application Infrastructure with 65 reviews while WebLogic Suite is ranked 11th in Application Infrastructure with 31 reviews. Oracle SOA Suite is rated 8.0, while WebLogic Suite is rated 8.2. The top reviewer of Oracle SOA Suite writes "Easy to setup, provides good support and scalable solution ". On the other hand, the top reviewer of WebLogic Suite writes "Simple setup, reliable, and performs well". Oracle SOA Suite is most compared with Mule ESB, Apache Web Server, TIBCO ActiveMatrix, Microsoft .NET Framework and IBM BPM, whereas WebLogic Suite is most compared with Oracle WebCenter, Microsoft .NET Framework, NGINX Plus and Apache Web Server. See our Oracle SOA Suite vs. WebLogic Suite report.
See our list of best Application Infrastructure vendors.
We monitor all Application Infrastructure reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
