We performed a comparison between Microsoft .NET Framework and Windows Process Activation Services based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about Microsoft, F5, Apache and others in Application Infrastructure."Pre-programmed functions for .NET Framework are widely available."
"The Windows Communication Foundation is the biggest advantage we get from the .NET Framework."
"Microsoft Platform is the only viable solution when I wish to do something that is not supposed to be cross-platform."
"The most valuable feature is customization."
"The solution's technical support is very good...The product's initial setup phase was easy."
"The .NET Framework is a very good framework. It does what I need it to do."
"The most valuable feature of Microsoft .NET Framework is debugging."
"User-friendly and straightforward."
"The most valuable aspect of the solution is the central console, that allows you to see all of the activated and deactivated computers."
"I would like to see more pre-built features in the MVC framework because as it is now, it's very open and you have to develop your own controls in order to use it."
"In the next release, I am looking for more advanced technologies such as socket communication and enhanced features like realtime chat with the clients."
"Improvements are needed in .NET development, particularly in a backend scenario."
"If AI could be incorporated in Microsoft .NET Framework it would be helpful."
"Microsoft could improve .NET Framework by providing more resources to help users understand the solution."
"The integration with DevOps tools, such as Azure DevOps, Jira, and GitLab, would be a valuable addition."
"The .NET open source community could be larger."
"The integration capability of the product with AI is an area with certain shortcomings, where improvements are required."
"The stability of the solution needs improvement."
Earn 20 points
Microsoft .NET Framework is ranked 4th in Application Infrastructure with 47 reviews while Windows Process Activation Services is ranked 23rd in Application Infrastructure. Microsoft .NET Framework is rated 8.4, while Windows Process Activation Services is rated 4.0. The top reviewer of Microsoft .NET Framework writes "Intuitive, easier to develop, maintain, and migrate from the old framework to newer versions". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Windows Process Activation Services writes "Central console enables us to see all of the activated and deactivated computers but it has poor alerts and frustrating technical support". Microsoft .NET Framework is most compared with IIS, Magic xpa Application Platform, JBoss Enterprise Application Platform, Apache Web Server and WebLogic Suite, whereas Windows Process Activation Services is most compared with IIS.
See our list of best Application Infrastructure vendors.
We monitor all Application Infrastructure reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.